Maio 2021 vol. 8 num. 2 - V Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação

Artigo completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

A influência das dimensões de proximidades na decisão de colaboração científica brasileira

Costa, Daniel Oliveira ; Gonçalves, Eduardo ; Garcia, Renato de Castro ;

Artigo completo:

O objetivo deste trabalho é entender a influência da proximidade social, institucional, organizacional, cognitiva e geográfica no contexto colaborativo entre pesquisadores no Sistema Nacional de Inovação (SNI) brasileiro no período entre 2009 a 2017. Trabalhos empíricos discutem essas proximidades em países com SNI desenvolvidos, servindo de referência para o presente estudo no SNI brasileiro, o qual é considerado imaturo. Embora os trabalhos sobre proximidades sejam vastos, a maioria desses estudos não consideram todas essas dimensões simultaneamente. Para construção da rede de pesquisadores e extração das proximidades foram utilizados dados extraídos da plataforma Lattes do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Os resultados mostram que todas as dimensões de produtividade são relevantes para explicar as publicações de pares de pesquisadores no Brasil. Especificamente, estar no mesmo estado, pertencer à mesma instituição e à mesma organização possuem associação positiva com o número de publicações. Além disso, interações prévias e contínuas entre os pesquisadores também são considerados fatores importantes.

Artigo completo:

This study aims to understand the role and influence of the social, institutional, organizational, cognitive and geographical proximities in a collaborative context between researchers in the Brazilian National Innovation System (NIS) in the period between 2009 and 2017. Empirical studies discuss these proximities in countries which have a developed NIS, taken as reference for the present study in the Brazilian NIS, which is considered immature. Although the vast number of studies that handle these dimensions, most of these studies do not consider all of them. To build the network of researchers and extract the proximities, we used the data from the Lattes platform of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). The results show that all dimensions of productivity are relevant to explain the publications of pairs of researchers in Brazil. Specifically, being in the same state, belonging to the same institution and to the same organization have a positive association with the number of publications. In addition, previous and continuous interactions between researchers are also considered to be important factors.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Conhecimento Científico; Análise de Redes Sociais; Proximidades; Plataforma Lattes,

Palavras-chave: Scientific Knowledge; Social Network Analysis; Proximity; Lattes platform,

DOI: 10.5151/v-enei-637

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ALBUQUERQUE, E. M. Notas sobre os determinantes tecnológicos do processo de catching-up: uma introdução à discussão sobre o papel dos sistemas nacionais de inovação na periferia. Estudos Econômicos, São Paulo, v.27(2), 1997.
  • [2] ALBUQUERQUE, E. M.; SILVA, L. A.; PÓVOA, L. Diferenciação Intersetorial na interação entre empresas e universidades no Brasil. São Paulo em Perspectiva, v. 19(1), p. 95-104, 2005.
  • [3] ALBUQUERQUE, E.; SUZIGAN, M.; KRUSS, G.; LEE, K. Developing National Systems of Innovation, Edward Elgar, 2015.
  • [4] ALBA, R.; KADUSHIN, C. The Intersection of Social Circles: A New Measure of Social Proximity in Networks Sociological Methods & Research v. 5(1), 1976.
  • [5] ANSELIN, L.; VARGA, A.; ACS, Z. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science v. 79, p. 435–445, 2000.
  • [6] ANSELIN, L.; VARGA, A.; ACS, Z. Geographical Spillovers and University Research: A Spatial Econometric Perspective. Growth and Change v. 31, p. 501-515, 2000.
  • [7] AUDRETSCH, D. B., FELDMAN, M. P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, v. 86, p. 630–640, 1996.
  • [8] BALLAND, P. A.; BOSCHMA, R.; FRENEN, K. Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics, Regional Studies, v. 49(6), 2015.
  • [9] BELUSSI, F., CALDARI, K. At the Origin of the Industrial District: Alfred Marshall and the Cambridge School.” Cambridge Journal of Economics v. 33(2), p. 335–355, 200
  • [10] BERNARDES, A.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. Cross-Over, thresholds and the interactions between Science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries. Research Policy, v. 32(5), p. 867-887.
  • [11] BODAS FREITAS, I. M.; GEUNA, A.; ROSSI, F. Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university–industry interactions, Research Policy, 42(1), p. 50-62, 2013.
  • [12] BONACCORSI, A.; DARAIO, C. Age effects in scientific productivity The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) Scientometrics, v. 58(1), p. 49-90, 2003.
  • [13] BORGATTI, S. P.; EVERETT, M. G.; JOHNSON, J. C. Analyzing Social Networks, London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 20
  • [14] BOSCHMA, R. Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, v. 39, 61-74, 2005.
  • [15] BROEKEL, T.; BOSCHMA, R. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox Journal of Economic Geography, v. 12(2), p. 409–433, 2012.
  • [16] BROEKE, T.; MUELLER, W. Critical links in knowledge networks – What about proximities and gatekeeper organizations? Industry and Innovation, v. 25(10), p. 919-939, 2018.
  • [17] CAPALDO, A.; PETRUZZELLI, M. Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge-Creating Alliances European Management Review, v. 11, p. 63–84, 2014.
  • [18] COHEN, W.M.; LEVINTHAL, D.A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal v. 99, p. 569–596, 1989.
  • [19] COHEN, W.M.; LEVINTHAL, D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 35, p. 128–152, 1990.
  • [20] COHENDET, P., LLERENA, P. (1997) Learning, technical change and public policy: how to create andexploit diversity. In C. Edquist (ed.) Systems of Innovation, p. 223–241, 1997.
  • [21] CRESCENZI, R.; NATHAN, M.; RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation Research Policy v. 45(1), p. 177-194, 2016.
  • [22] CRESCENZI, R.; FILIPPETTI, A.; IAMMARINO, S. Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry Journal of Technological Transfer, 2017.
  • [23] DANELL, R. The contribution of authors: A study of the relationship between the size and composition of author teams Ed Noyons, Leiden, Netherlands: Leiden university, p. 123-13, 2014.
  • [24] D’ESTE, P.; GUY, F.; IAMMATINO, S. Shaping the formation of universtiy-industry research collaboration: what type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, v. 13 p. 537-558, 2012.
  • [25] D’ESTE, P.; PATEL, P. University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Rsearch Policy v. 36(9), 2007.
  • [26] FERNÁNDEZ, A.; FERRÁNDIZ, E.; LEÓN, M. D. Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: The closer, the better? Scientometrics, v. 106(3), p. 1073-1092, 2016.
  • [27] GARCIA, R.; ARAÚJO, V.; MASCARINI, S.; SANTOS E. G.; COSTA, A. R. How the Benefits, Results and Barriers of Collaboration Affect University Engagement with Industry. Science and Public Policy, p. 347-357, v. 46(3), 2019.
  • [28] GEISLER, E.; RUBENSTEIN, A. H. University—Industry Relations: A Review of Major Issues Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry—University—Government Relationship p. 43-62, 1989.
  • [29] HERINGA, P.; HESSELS, L. K.; VAN DER ZOUWEN The influence of proximity dimensions on international research collaboration: an analysis of European water projects Industry and Innovation, v. 23(8), p. 753-772, 2016.
  • [30] HERINGA, P.; HORLINGS, E.; VAN DER ZOUWEN, M.; VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P.; VAN VIERSSEN W. How dimensions of proximity relate to the outcome of collaboration? A survey of knowledge-intensive networks in the Dutch water sector Economics of Innovation and New Technology, v.23(7), p. 689-716, 2014.
  • [31] HILBE, Joseph M. Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • [32] HONG, W.; SU, Y. S. The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data Research Policy v. 42, p. 454-464, 2013.
  • [33] JENSEN, M. B.; JOHNSON, B.; LORENZ, E.; LUNDCALL, B.A. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy v. 36, p. 680–693, 2007.
  • [34] KAYGALAK, I.; REID, N. Innovation and knowledge spillovers in Turkey: The role of geographic and organizational proximity: Innovation and knowledge spillovers in Turkey Regional Science Policy & Practice v. 8(1-2), p. 45-60, 2016.
  • [35] KIRAT. T, LUNG, Y. Innovation and proximity. Territories as loci of collective learning processes, European Urban and Regional Studies v. 6, p. 27–38, 1999.
  • [36] LAGENDIJK, A.; LORENTZEN, A. Proximity, Knowledge and Innovation in Peripheral Regions. On the Intersection between Geographical and Organizational Proximity European Planning Studies, v. 15(4), 2007.
  • [37] LATA, R.; PROFF, S.; BRENNER, T. The influence of distance types on co-patenting and co-publishing in the USA and Europe over time. The Annuals of Regional Science. v. 61 (1), Heidelberg, 2018.
  • [38] LAURSEN, K.; SALTER, A. Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy v. 33, p. 1201-1215, 2004.
  • [39] MARSHAL, A. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume, Londres: Macmillan, 1920.
  • [40] MENA-CHALCO, J. P.; DIGIAMPIETRI, L. A.; LOPES, F. M.; CESAR JR R. M. Brazilian Bibliometric Coauthorship Networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 65(7), p. 1424–1445, 2014.
  • [41] MUSCIO, A.; POZZALI, A. The effects of cultural distance in university-industry collaborations. Some evidence from Italian universities The Journal of Technology Transfer v. 38(4), 2013.
  • [42] NOOTEBOOM, B. Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • [43] NOOTEBOOM, B., VAN HAVERBEKE, W., DUYSTERS, G., GILSING, V., VAN DEN OORD, A. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, v. 36, p. 1016–1034, 2007
  • [44] PACI, R.; MARROCU, E.; USAI, S. The Complementary Effects of Proximity Dimensions on Knowledge Spillovers Spatial Economic Analysis v. 9(1), p. 9-30, 2014.
  • [45] PONDS, R.; OORT, F. V.; FRENKEN, K. The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration Regional Science, v. 86(3), p. 423-443, 2007.
  • [46] SAXENIAN, A. Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs, Public Policy Institute of California, 1999.
  • [47] SORENSON, O.; RIVKIN, J. W.; FLEMING, L. Complexity, networks and knowledge flow Research Policy v. 35 p. 994–1017, 2006.
  • [48] SMITH, C; SOTALA, K. Knowledge, networks and nations Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century The Royal Society v. 03/11, 2011.
Como citar:

Costa, Daniel Oliveira; Gonçalves, Eduardo; Garcia, Renato de Castro; "A influência das dimensões de proximidades na decisão de colaboração científica brasileira", p. 336-355 . In: Anais do V Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação (ENEI): “Inovação, Sustentabilidade e Pandemia”. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/v-enei-637

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações