Dezembro 2024 vol. 11 num. 2 - X Simpósio Internacional de Inovação e Tecnologia

Completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES AS TOOLS FOR EVALUATING CARBON SEQUEST IN SOILS IN SEMIARID REGIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES AS TOOLS FOR EVALUATING CARBON SEQUEST IN SOILS IN SEMIARID REGIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Carvalho, Nilza Carolina Ramos Silva ; Romero, Danilo Jefferson ; Anjos, Jeancarlo Pereira dos ;

Completo:

"The objective of this study was to analyze and evaluate in scientific articles methodologies used in quantifying soil organic carbon (SOC) in semi-arid regions, showing that it is essential to quantify the carbon balance in the soil not only to evaluate the potential of the reservoir, but also to define management strategies for mitigating climate change. A systematic review was carried out in databases considering publications between 2019 and 2023, identifying 47 works. After applying the exclusion criteria, 04 works were analyzed. It is concluded that the methodologies used are useful tools for evaluating carbon sequestration in different types of soils through the quantification of SOC; the technological limitations of each method did not restrict the objective evaluation of the work. Keywords: Soil; Semi-arid; Climate Change; Carb"

Completo:

"The objective of this study was to analyze and evaluate in scientific articles methodologies used in quantifying soil organic carbon (SOC) in semi-arid regions, showing that it is essential to quantify the carbon balance in the soil not only to evaluate the potential of the reservoir, but also to define management strategies for mitigating climate change. A systematic review was carried out in databases considering publications between 2019 and 2023, identifying 47 works. After applying the exclusion criteria, 04 works were analyzed. It is concluded that the methodologies used are useful tools for evaluating carbon sequestration in different types of soils through the quantification of SOC; the technological limitations of each method did not restrict the objective evaluation of the work. Keywords: Soil; Semi-arid; Climate Change; Carb"

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Soil; Semi-arid; Climate Change; Carbon Sequestration,

Palavras-chave: Soil; Semi-arid; Climate Change; Carbon Sequestration,

DOI: 10.5151/siintec2024-391881

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "1CANADELL, Josep G. et al. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
  • [2] Global carbon and other biogeochemical cycles and feedback. In: Climate change
  • [3] 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth
  • [4] assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
  • [5] Cambridge University Press, 2023. p. 673-816.
  • [6] 2NABUURS, Gert-Jan et al. Agriculture, forestry and other land uses (AFOLU). In:
  • [7] Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,
  • [8] 2023. p. 747-860.
  • [9] 3LAL, Rattan et al. The role of soil in regulation of climate. Philosophical
  • [10] Transactions of the Royal Society B, v. 376, n. 1834, p. 20210084, 2021.
  • [11] 4RAZA, Sajjad et al. Inorganic carbon losses by soil acidification jeopardize global
  • [12] efforts on carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation. Journal of Cleaner
  • [13] Production, v. 315, p. 128036, 2021. 5GRAY, Jonathan M.; BISHOP, Thomas FA; WILSON, Brian R. Factors controlling
  • [14] soil organic carbon stocks with depth in eastern Australia. Soil Science Society of
  • [15] America Journal, v. 79, n. 6, p. 1741-1751, 20
  • [16] 6GOLLA, Begizew. Agricultural production system in arid and semi-arid regions.
  • [17] International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology, v. 7, n. 2, p.
  • [18] 234-244, 2021.
  • [19] 7MOHER, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and
  • [20] meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, v. 151, n. 4, p.
  • [21] 264-269, 2009.
  • [22] 8PAGE, Matthew J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for
  • [23] reporting systematic reviews. bmj, v. 372, 2021.
  • [24] 9RODRIGUES, Cristina I. Dias; BRITO, Luís Miguel; NUNES, Leonel JR. Soil carbon
  • [25] sequestration in the context of climate change mitigation: A review. Soil Systems, v.
  • [26] 7, n. 3, p. 64, 2023.
  • [27] 10GUPTA, Dipak Kumar et al. Carbon sequestration potential of Hardwickia binata
  • [28] Roxb. based agroforestry in the hot semi-arid environment of India. Current science,
  • [29] v. 116, n. 1, p. 112-116, 2019.
  • [30] 11ZHANG, Xiaojing et al. Changes in vegetation cover and its influencing factors in
  • [31] the inner Mongolia reach of the yellow river basin from 2001 to 2018. Environmental
  • [32] Research, v. 215, p. 114253, 2022.
  • [33] 12SABETIZADE, Marmar et al. Combination of MIR spectroscopy and environmental
  • [34] covariates to predict soil organic carbon in a semi-arid region. Catena, v. 196, p.
  • [35] 104844, 2021.
  • [36] 13CHEN, Yulu et al. Spatiotemporal variation of well-dated soil organic carbon pool in
  • [37] Northeast China during the Holocene. Quaternary Sciences, v. 42, n. 5, p.
  • [38] 1311-1327, 2022.
  • [39] 14WALKLEY, Allan. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic
  • [40] carbon in soils—effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil
  • [41] constituents. Soil science, v. 63, n. 4, p. 251-264, 1947.
  • [42] 15DAHY, Basam et al. Non-Conventional Methods as a New Alternative for the
  • [43] Estimation of Terrestrial Biomass and Carbon Sequestered. World Journal of
  • [44] Agriculture and Soil Science, v. 4, p. 1-8, 2019.
  • [45] 16CHATTERJEE, Amitava et al. Evaluation of different soil carbon determination
  • [46] methods. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, v. 28, n. 3, p. 164-178, 2009.
  • [47] 17MADARI, Beata E. et al. Mid‐and near‐infrared spectroscopic determination of
  • [48] carbon in a diverse set of soils from the Brazilian National Soil Collection.
  • [49] Spectroscopy Letters, v. 38, n. 6, p. 721-740, 2005.
  • [50] 18DE OLIVEIRA, L. B. et al. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. Embrapa Solos:
  • [51] Brasília, DF. 3. ed. rev. e ampl, 2017.
  • [52] 19FAO, A. A protocol for measurement, monitoring, reporting and verification of soil
  • [53] organic carbon in agricultural landscapes—GSOC‐MRV Protocol. FAO, Rome, 2020"
Como citar:

Carvalho, Nilza Carolina Ramos Silva; Romero, Danilo Jefferson; Anjos, Jeancarlo Pereira dos; "ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES AS TOOLS FOR EVALUATING CARBON SEQUEST IN SOILS IN SEMIARID REGIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW", p. 789-796 . In: . São Paulo: Blucher, 2024.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/siintec2024-391881

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações