Dezembro 2016 vol. 3 num. 4 - 1º Encontro da Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação

Artigo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

CONTRIBUIÇÕES DA GEOGRAFIA ECONÔMICA EVOLUCIONÁRIA PARA A COMPREENSÃO DA DINÂMICA INOVATIVA

STEFANI, Rafael ; RUFFONI, Janaina ;

Artigo:

O ambiente econômico atual traz a mudança técnica como elemento dependente da topologia relacional dos atores e do arranjo instalado de firmas e instituições no território, que assume um protagonismo, não sendo mais tratado como um elemento passivo. As aglomerações industriais inovadoras são explicadas pela geração e troca de conhecimento, sendo interdependentes das redes sociais e dos contextos institucionais e locais. A perspectiva evolucionista em geografia econômica ocupa-se com a formação da paisagem econômica e entende que as experiências e as competências aprendidas por indivíduos em determinada localidade ao longo do tempo pode determinar o presente e a trajetória futura do espaço e provocar uma mudança competitiva. Considerando esse cenário, o artigo objetiva apresentar a área da Geografia Econômica Evolucionária e propor uma reflexão para compreender se e como esta auxilia na análise da mudança técnica. O resultado apresenta a Geografia Econômica Evolucionária com uma fertilidade intelectual importante para o entendimento da dinamica inovativa e da transformação do cenário técnico de regiões.

Artigo:

The current economic environment brings technical change as an element dependent on relational topology of the actors and the installed arrangement of firms and institutions in the territory, which plays a role, no longer treated as a passive element. Innovative industrial clusters are explained by the generation and exchange of knowledge, being interdependent social networks and institutional and local contexts. The evolutionary perspective on economic geography is concerned with the formation of the economic landscape and understand that the experiences and skills learned by individuals in a given location over time can determine the present and the future path of space and cause a competitive change. Given this scenario, the article presents the area of Evolutionary Economic Geography and propose a reflection to understand if and how this assists in technical change analysis. The result shows the Evolutionary Economic Geography with an important intellectual fertility for understanding the dynamics and innovative transformation of the technical scenario regions.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Geografia Econômica Evolucionária, dinâmicas de proximidade, inovação,

Palavras-chave: Evolutionay Economic Geography, proximity dynamics, innovation,

DOI: 10.5151/engpro-1enei-020

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] AMIN, A.; THRIFT, N. What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography? Antipode, Malden, v. 32, n. 1, p. 4-9, 2000.
  • [2] ARAÚJO, V. C. Dimensão local da inovação no Brasil: determinantes e efeitos de proximidade. Tese de Doutorado. Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, 2013.
  • [3] ARROW, K. Economic welfare and the allocation of ressources to invention. In: NELSON, R. (Ed). The rate and direction of inventive activity, NBER, Princeton, 1962.
  • [4] AUTANT-BERNARD, C. The geography of knowledge spillovers and technological proximity. Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation. New York, v 25, p. 181-197, 2002. Documento em PDF.
  • [5] BALLAND,P. A. Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry. Regional Studies, London, v. 46, n. 6, p. 741-759, 2012.
  • [6] BARABÁSI, A. L. Linked: the new science of networks. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing, 2002.
  • [7] BEAUDRY, C.; SCHIFFAUEROVA, A. Who´s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, [S.I.], v. 38, n. 2, p. 318-337, 2009.
  • [8] BOSCHMA, R. A. Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, London, v. 38, n. 9, p. 1001–1014, 2004.
  • [9] BOSCHMA, R. A. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, London, v. 39, n. 1, p. 61-74, 2005.
  • [10] BOSCHMA, R. A.; FRENKEN, K. The special evolution of innovative networks: a proximity perspective. In: BOSCHMA, R. A.; MARTIN, R. L. (Ed). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltebham, 20
  • [11] BOSCHMA, R. A.; FRENKEN, K. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, London, v. 6, p. 273-302, 2006.
  • [12] BOSCHMA, R. A.; LAMBOOY, J. G. Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, [S.I.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 411–429, 1999.
  • [13] BOSCHMA, R. A.; MARTIN, R. L. The aim and scope of evolutionary economic geography. In: BOSCHMA, R. A.; MARTIN, R. L. (Ed). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltebham, 2010.
  • [14] BOSCHMA, R. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, London, v. 49, n. 5, p. 733-751, 2015.
  • [15] BOSCHMA, R.; FRENKEN, K. Evolutionary Economic Geography. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht University, 20
  • [16] BOUBA-OLGA, O. et al. Editorial: proximity dynamics, social networks and innovation. Regional Studies, London, v. 49, n. 6, p. 901-906, 2015.
  • [17] BOUBA-OLGA, O.; GROSSETTI, M.; FERRU, M. How I meet my partner: reconsidering proximities. In: TORRE, A.; WALLET, F. (Ed). Regional development and proximity relation, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, 2014.
  • [18] BRAKNMAN, S.; GARRETSEN, H. Rethinking the “new” geographical economics. Regional Studies, London, v. 37, n. 6, p. 637-648, 2003.
  • [19] BRESCHI, S; LISSONI, F. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, London, v. 10, n. 4, p. 975-1005, 2001.
  • [20] BROEKEL, T. et al. Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: a discussion of four methods. The Annals of Regional Science, [S.I.], v. 53, n. 2, p. 423-452, 2014.
  • [21] BROEKEL, T. The co-evolution of proximities: a network level study. Regional Studies, London, v. 49, n. 6, p. 921-935, 2015.
  • [22] BROEKEL, T.; BOSCHMA, R. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, London, v. 1, p. 1-25, 2011.
  • [23] BRINCO, R. Velhos e novos caminhos da geografia da inovação. In: CONCEIÇÃO, O. A. C.; GRANDO, M. Z.; TERUCHKIN, S. U.; FARIA, L. A. E. (Org.). O ambiente regional. Porto Alegre: FEE, 2010.
  • [24] CARRINCAZEAUX, C.; LUNG, Y.; VICENTE, J. The scientific trajectory of the French School of Proximity: interaction- and institution-based approaches to regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, [S.I.], v. 16, n. 5, p. 617-628, 2008. COASE, R. The nature of the firm. Economica, London, v. 4, n. 16, 1937.
  • [25] COHEN, W. M.; LEVINTHAL, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Michigan, v. 35, n.1, p. 128-152, 1990.
  • [26] COTELO, F. C.; HERMANN, B. M.; GOLDBAUM, S. A controvérsia NEG x PEG: uma disputa metodológica no campo da geografia econômica. [S.l.], 2014. CRUZ, B. O.; FURTADO, B. A.; MONASTERIO, L.; JÚNIOR, W. R. (Ed). Economia regional e urbana: teorias e métodos com ênfase no Brasil, IPEA, Brasília, 2011.
  • [27] DAVIDS, M.; FRENKEN, K. Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: the case of Unilever’s Becel diet margarine. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht, n. 15.04, Nov. 2015..
  • [28] DOLOREUX, D.; SHEARMUR, R. Collaboration, information and the geography of innovation in knowledge intensive business service. Journal of Economic Geography, London, v. 12, n. 1, p. 79-105, 2011.
  • [29] DOSI, G.; SOETE, L. Technical change and international trade. In: DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, C.; NELSON, R.; SILVERBERG, G.; SOETE, L. (Ed). Technical change and economic theory, London Pinter, 1988.
  • [30] FELDMAN, M. P. The geography of innovation, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 1994.
  • [31] FUJITA, M.; THISSE, J. F. Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • [32] GERTLER, M. S., “Being there”: proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography, Worcester, v. 71, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1995. Documento em PDF.
  • [33] GIULIANI, E. Network dynamics in regional cluster: the perspective of an emerging economy. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht, n. 10, 14 Nov. 2010.
  • [34] GODART, F. C. Trends networks: multidimensional proximity and the formation of aesthetic choice in the creative economy. Regional Studies, London, v. 49, n. 6, p. 973-984, 2015.
  • [35] GONÇALVES, E.; FJARDO B. A. G., 2011. Influência da Proximidade Tecnológica e Geográfica sobre a Inovação Regional do Brasil. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, Rio de Janeiro, v 15, n 1, p. 112-142.
  • [36] GRANOVETTER, M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 9, n. 3, p. 481-510, 1985.
  • [37] GRANOVETTER, M. S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 8, n. 6, p. 1360-1380, 1973.
  • [38] GREUNZ, L. Geographically and techonologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions. The Annals of Regional Science, [S.I.] v. 37, p. 657-680, 2003.
  • [39] HAUSMANN, U. Neither industrial district nor innovative milieu: entrepreneurs and their context. An actor-oriented framework and case studies from Greater London and Zurich. 36° European Regional Science Association, Zurique, Suíça, 1996.
  • [40] HODGSON, G. M. Institutional economics: surveying the “old” and the “new”. Metroeconomica, [S.I.]. v. 44, n. 1, p. 1-28, 1993. Documento em PDF.
  • [41] HOWELLS, J. R. L. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, v. 39, p. 871-884, 2002.
  • [42] HUBER, F. Do Cluster Really Matter for Inovation Practices in Information Technology? Questioning the Significance of Technological Knowledge Spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, p. 107-126, 2012.
  • [43] JAFFE, A. B.; TRAJTENBERG, M.; HENDERSON, R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford, v. 108, n. 3, p. 577–598, 1993.
  • [44] JOHNSON, D. K. N.; LYBECKER K.M . Does distance matter less now? The changing role of geography in biotechnology innovation. Review of Industrial Organization, 40, p. 21-35, 2012.
  • [45] KIRAT, T.; LUNG, Y. Innovation and proximity: territories as loci of collective learning process. European Urban and Regional Studies, London, v. 6, n. 1, p. 27-38, 1999.
  • [46] KLEPPER, S. The evolution of the U.S. automobile industry and Detroit as its capital. [S.I.], 30 Dec. 2001 Paper presented at 9th Congress of the International Schumpeter Society, Gainesville..
  • [47] KNOBEN, J.; OERLEMANS, L. A. G. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: a literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, [S.I.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 71-89, 2006.
  • [48] KOGLER, D. F. Editorial: evolutionary economic geography – theoretical and empirical progress. Regional Studies, London, v. 49, n. 5, p. 705-711, 2015. KRUGMAN, P. R. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, Chicago, v. 99, n. 3, p. 483-499, 1991.
  • [49] MARSHALL, A., 1920. Principles of Economics, MacMillan, London.
  • [50] MARTIN, R. L.; SUNLEY P. The place of path dependence in a evolutionary perspectiveon the economic landscape. In: BOSCHMA, R. A.; MARTIN, R. L. (Ed). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltebham, 2010.
  • [51] METCALFE, J.S. Institution and progress. CRIC discussion paper, Manchester, n. 45, 2001.
  • [52] NEARY, P. Of hype and hyperbolas: introducing the new economic geography. Journal of Economic Literature, Pittsburgh, v. 39, n. 2, p. 536-561, 2001.
  • [53] NELSON R., WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge Massachussets and London, England. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.
  • [54] NELSON, R. R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, Pittsburgh, v. 33, p. 48-90, 1995.
  • [55] NOTEBOOM, B. Innovation, learning and industrial organization. Cambridge Journal of Economics, London, v. 23, p. 127-150, 1999.
  • [56] RALLET, A. Economia da proximidade: em direção a um balanço. Cadernos IPPUR, Rio de Janeiro, ano 16, n.2, p. 59-80, 2002.
  • [57] RALLET, A.; TORRE, A. Economie industrielle et economie spatial, Paris: Economica, 1995.
  • [58] RALLET, A.; TORRE, A. Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the area of global economy? GeoJournal, [S.I.], v. 49, n. 1, p. 373-380, 1999.
  • [59] RUFFONI, J.; SUZIGAN, W. Inovação Tecnológica de Firmas em Sistemas Locais de Produção: a realidade dos produtores de máquinas para calçados do Rio Grande do Sul. Ensaios FEE (Impresso), v. 33, p. 1005-1036, 2016.
  • [60] SCHILLER, M. C. O. S. Regulação dos territórios e dinâmicas institucionais da proximidade. Cadernos IPPUR, Rio de Janeiro, ano 18, n. 1-2, p. 161-179, 2004.
  • [61] SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper, 1942.
  • [62] SIMON, H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford, v. 6, p. 99-118, 1955.
  • [63] STEFANI, R.; LIMA, J. J. M. Proximidade geográfica e fluxos de conhecimento: uma metanálise possível sobre os novos achados na construção da dinâmica inovativa. [S.l.], 2014. Trabalho apresentado no 7º Encontro de Economia Gaúcha, Porto Alegre, 2014.
  • [64] TER WAL, A. L. J.; BOSCHMA, R. A. Applying social network analysis in economic geography: theoretical and methodological issues. The Annals of Regional Science, [S.I.], v. 43, n. 3, p. 739-756, 2009
  • [65] TORRE, A.; GILLY, J. P. On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Regional Studies, London, v 34, n. 2, p. 169-180, 1999.
  • [66] TORRE, A.; RALLET, A. Proximity and Localization. Regional Studies, London, v. 39, n. 1, p. 47-59, 2005..
  • [67] UZZI, B. Social Structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quartely, v. 42, n. 1, p. 35-67, 1997.
  • [68] WETERINGS, A.; BOSCHMA, R. Does spatial proximity to costumers matter for innovative performance? Evidence from the Duch software sector. Research Policy, [S.I.], v. 38, n. 5, p. 746-755, 2009.
  • [69] WILLIAMSON, O. E. The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 87, n. 3, p. 548-577, 1981.
Como citar:

STEFANI, Rafael; RUFFONI, Janaina; "CONTRIBUIÇÕES DA GEOGRAFIA ECONÔMICA EVOLUCIONÁRIA PARA A COMPREENSÃO DA DINÂMICA INOVATIVA", p. 334-353 . In: Anais do 1º Encontro da Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação [=Blucher Engineering Proceedings, v.3 n.4]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2016.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/engpro-1enei-020

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações