Outubro 2021 vol. 9 num. 1 - 10º Congresso Internacional de Design da Informação e 10º Congresso Nacional de Iniciação Científica em Design

Full Paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Design e bem-estar: uma abordagem hedônica e eudaimônica para CPS

Design e bem-estar: uma abordagem hedônica e eudaimônica para CPS

Alexandre, Rosana Ferreira ; Providência, Bernardo ;

Full Paper:

"Este artigo faz parte de uma pesquisa multidisciplinar sobre valores e riscos de sistemas ciber-físicos(CPS) em andamento. Apresentamos um recorte da mesma, a partir da perspectiva do design. Com estefoco, buscamos entender como os CPS, peças fundamentais da indústria 4.0, podem ser projetados deforma a serem não apenas funcionais, como também contribuirem para o bem-estar das pessoas. Umparalelo semântico foi feito a partir do levantamento bibliográfico sobre valores que são mais importantesnum projeto de design, e num projeto de CPS especificamente, com a escala de bem-estar HEMA. Comoresultado, é proposto um modelo conceitual teórico com 12 valores que servem como base paradesenvolvimento de CPS com foco no bem-estar das pessoas. Por fim, apresentamos uma visão geraldas etapas futuras da pesquisa."

Full Paper:

"This article is part of an ongoing multidisciplinary research on the values and risks of cyber-physicalsystems (CPS). Here we present a snapshot of it, from the design point of view. With this focus in mind, weseek to understand how CPS, as the foundations of Industry 4.0, can be projected in a way that not onlyworks, but also contributes, to people wellbeing. A semantic parallel was made from the bibliographicalsurvey on the most important values in a design project, and in a CPS project specifically, with the HEMAwellbeing scale. As a result, a conceptual theoretical model is proposed with 12 values that serve as abasis for the development of the CPS with a focus on people wellbeing. Finally, we present an overview offuture steps of the research."

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Design para o bem-estar, modelo conceitual, valores, CPS,

Palavras-chave: Design for well-being, conceptual model, values, CPS,

DOI: 10.5151/cidicongic2021-061-355613-CIDI-Saude.pdf

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "Asadollah, S. A., Inam, R., & Hansson, H. (2015, November). A survey on testing for cyber
  • [2] physical system. In IFIP International Conference on Testing Software and Systems (pp.
  • [3] 194-207). Springer, Cham.
  • [4] Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. The impact of control technology, 12(1), 161-166.
  • [5] Blijlevens, J., Thurgood, C., Hekkert, P., Chen, L. L., Leder, H., & Whitfield, T. W. (2017). The Aesthetic Pleasure in Design Scale: The development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 86.
  • [6] Brown, Tim. Design thinking: uma metodologia poderosa para decretar o fim das velhas ideias. Tradução Cristina Yamagami. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010.
  • [7] Broo, Didem Gürdür, Ulf Boman, and Martin Törngren. ""Cyber-physical systems research and education in 2030: Scenarios and strategies."" Journal of Industrial Information Integration 21 (2021): 100192.
  • [8] Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design issues, 17(4), 3-23.
  • [9] Cagan, J. M., & Vogel, C. M. (2020). Creating breakthrough products: revealing the secrets that drive global innovation. ETC Press.
  • [10] Cardoso, R. (2012). Design para um mundo complexo. São Paulo, Cosac Naify.
  • [11] Casais, Mafalda, Symbolic meaning, and its link to design for happiness in: Jimenez, S.,
  • [12] Pohlmeyer, A. E., & Desmet, P. M. A. (2015). Positive design: Reference guide. Delft
  • [13] University of Technology
  • [14] Correia, A. B., Deus, P., & Baptista, J. R. (2016). Indústria 4.0: Construir a empresa digital. PricewaterhouseCoopers Portugal, 1, 1-30.
  • [15] CPS PWG. Cyber Physical Systems Public Working - Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems, Release 1.0, May 2016.
  • [16] Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge university press.
  • [17] Daudt, F. (2018). Design para forças de caráter: estudo sobre a aplicação da abordagem de design voltada ao bem-estar subjetivo.
  • [18] Den Ouden, E. (2011). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • [19] Desmet, P. M., & Pohlmeyer, A. E. (2013). Positive design: An introduction to design for
  • [20] subjective well-being. International journal of design, 7(3).
  • [21] Desmet, P., & Hassenzahl, M. (2012). Towards happiness: Possibility-driven design. In Humancomputer interaction: The agency perspective (pp. 3-27). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • [22] Desmet, P., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International journal of design, 1(1), 57-66.
  • [23] Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266 DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F., & Forlizzi, J. (2005). Imitating the human form: Four kinds of
  • [24] anthropomorphic form. Unpublished manuscript. Accessed April.
  • [25] Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of
  • [26] anthropomorphism. Psychological review, 114(4), 864.
  • [27] Freire, T., Zenhas, F., Tavares, D., & Iglésias, C. (2013). Felicidade Hedónica e Eudaimónica: Um estudo com adolescentes portugueses. Análise Psicológica, 31(4), 329-342.
  • [28] Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. G. (2019). Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. Mit Press.
  • [29] Geisberger, E., & Broy, M. (Eds.). (2015). Living in a networked world: Integrated research
  • [30] agenda Cyber-Physical Systems (agendaCPS). Herbert Utz Verlag.
  • [31] Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M., & Zühlke, D. (2014, July). Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era. In 2014 12th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) (pp. 289-294). IEEE.
  • [32] Gil, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social.São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
  • [33] Griffor, E. R., Greer, C., Wollman, D. A., & Burns, M. J. (2017). Framework for cyber-physical systems: Volume 2, working group reports.
  • [34] Grilo, A. (2019). Experiência do usuário em interfaces digitais.
  • [35] Gunes, V., Peter, S., Givargis, T., & Vahid, F. (2014). A survey on concepts, applications, and challenges in cyber-physical systems. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems, 8(12).
  • [36] Hassenzahl, M. (2001). The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness.
  • [37] International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 481-499.
  • [38] Hertenstein, J. H., Platt, M. B., & Veryzer, R. W. (2013). What is' good design'? An investigation of the complexity and structure of design. Design Management Journal, 8(1), 8-21.
  • [39] Huta, V. (2016). Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations: Theoretical considerations and research findings. In Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 215-231). Springer, Cham.
  • [40] Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of happiness studies, 11(6), 735-762.
  • [41] Industry 5.0. Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European
  • [42] Commission. Brussels, Manuscript completed in January 2021. First edition.
  • [43] ISO 9241-210:2019(en) Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Disponível em: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-
  • [44] 210:ed-2:v1:en.
  • [45] Jordan, P. W. (2005). Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human
  • [46] factors. CRC press.
  • [47] Kagermann, D., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the Future of German
  • [48] Manufacturing Industry: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative
  • [49] INDUSTRIE 4.0, Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, retrieved April 5, 2015. Kalantari, M. (2017). Consumers' adoption of wearable technologies: literature review,
  • [50] synthesis, and future research agenda. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 12(3), 274-307.
  • [51] Kamp, Irene, and Pieter Desmet. Measuring product happiness. CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2014.
  • [52] Klapperich, H., Laschke, M., & Hassenzahl, M. (2018, September). The positive practice
  • [53] canvas: gathering inspiration for wellbeing-driven design. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 74-81).
  • [54] Knoester, J., Djajadiningrat, T., & Ross, P. (2012). Fluenci: The expression of expressing.
  • [55] Design and semantics of form and movement, 46.
  • [56] Lee, E. A. (2008, May). Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. In 2008 11th IEEE
  • [57] international symposium on object and component-oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC) (pp. 363-369). IEEE.
  • [58] Lee, J. M., Baek, J., & Ju, D. Y. (2018). Anthropomorphic Design: Emotional Perception for Deformable Object. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1829.
  • [59] Lyu, X., Ding, Y., & Yang, S. H. (2019). Safety and security risk assessment in cyber-physical systems. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 4(3), 221-232
  • [60] Meyer, E., Tonetto, L. M., da Rosa, V. M., & de Cássia Garcia, A. (2020). Service design and design for wellbeing: A Literature Review about the Relationship Between Them. e-Revista LOGO, 9(1), 97-116.
  • [61] O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2010). The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 50-69.
  • [62] Petermans, A., & Cain, R. (Eds.). (2019). Design for Wellbeing: an applied approach.
  • [63] Routledge.
  • [64] Peters, D., Calvo, R. A., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for motivation, engagement and
  • [65] wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 797.
  • [66] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-1
  • [67] Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of
  • [68] psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.
  • [69] Sanders, Elizabeth B. N. Design Serving People. Cumulus Working Papers. Publication Series
  • [70] G University of Art and Design Helsinki, 2006.
  • [71] Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 279-298). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • [72] Seligman, Martin. Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. 2011
  • [73] Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(2), 325.)
  • [74] Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human
  • [75] values. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(3), 550. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of
  • [76] sustainable change. Review of general psychology, 9(2), 111-131. "
Como citar:

Alexandre, Rosana Ferreira ; Providência, Bernardo ; "Design e bem-estar: uma abordagem hedônica e eudaimônica para CPS", p. 811-825 . In: Anais do 10º CIDI | Congresso Internacional de Design da Informação, edição 2021 e do 10º CONGIC | Congresso Nacional de Iniciação Científica em Design da Informação. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/cidicongic2021-061-355613-CIDI-Saude.pdf

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações