Blucher Design Proceedings

Dezembro 2020, vol.8, num.5 - Colóquio Internacional de Design 2020
Artigo completo - Open Access Idioma principal | Segundo principal

Design, pesquisa, ciência e academia:conflitos e aproximações

Design, research, science and academy: conflicts and approximations

Luccas, Lucas Ferreira; Magalhães, Cláudio de Freitas

Artigo completo:

O campo do design surgiu e se desenvolveu historicamente inserido em uma divisão conceitual depráticas e conhecimentos: humanidades e ciências naturais, artes e engenharias. Este artigo visatraçar relações entre o conceito de projeto no campo do Design, as tradições epistemológicas daCiência Moderna segundo Japiassu (1978) e os seus conflitos ao se inserir no ambiente acadêmico euniversitário. Compara também a atividade de design através das perspectivas positivista econstrutivista e suas influências na formação do campo. A partir de exemplos de teorias e práticasacadêmicas do Design baseada em Dorst (2016), discute a prática do campo artificial "DesignAcadêmico" (Academic Design, tradução do autor) proposto por ele (DORST, 2013) e o método dePesquisa Através do Design (Research Through Design, RtD) de Frayling (1993) para descrever atendência futura de aproximação destes ambientes. A conclusão aponta para uma diversificação naspráticas, métodos e epistemologias dentro do campo do design tornando cada vez mais difícilenquadrá-lo nas categorias binárias e exigindo aptidão para pensar além dos próprios limites.

The field of design was historically born and developed in between a conceptual division of practicesand knowledges: humanities and sciences, arts and engineering. The following paper tracesrelationships between the concept of project in the field of Design, epistemological traditions fromModern Science as described by Japiassu (1978) and its conflicts when integrated into academiccontext. It compares design activity through the perspectives of positivism and construcivism and itsinfluences in the field formation. From academic practices and theories based in Dorst (2016), itdiscusses about Academic Design, an artificial field and practice proposed by the same author(DORST, 2013) and the Research through Design method (RtD) as established by Frayling (1993) todescribe a convergent tendency of these mediums in the future. The conclusion points to adiversification in practices, methods and epistemologies within the design field, making it even harderto fit it into the binary categories and requiring the ability to think beyond its own limits.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/cid2020-56

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ARCHER, Bruce; BAYNES, Ken; ROBERTS, Phil; et al. A framework for design and design education: a reader containing key papers from the 1970s and 80s. Wellesbourne: DATA, 2005.
  • [2] BONSIEPE, Gui. Design, cultura e sociedade. São Paulo: Blucher, 2011.
  • [3] BUCHANAN, Richard. Education and Professional Practice in Design. Design Issues, v. 14, n. 2, p.63, 1998.
  • [4] BRAHA, Dan; REICH, Yoram. Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes. Research in Engineering Design, v. 14, p. 185–199, 2003.
  • [5] CROSS, Nigel. Developments in design methodology. Chichester; New York: Wiley, 1984.
  • [6] DORST, Kees; DIJKHUIS, Judith. Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 261–274, 1995. (Analysing Design Activity).
  • [7] DORST, Kees. Academic Design. In: Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2013.
  • [8] DORST, Kees. Design practice and design research: finally together? In: Proceedings of DRS2016. Brighton, United Kingdom: Design Research Society, p. 10, 2016.
  • [9] DUNNE, Anthony; RABY, Fiona. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. Cambridge, Massachusetts ; London: The MIT Press, 2013.
  • [10] FRAYLING, Christopher. Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, v. 1, n. 1, 1993.
  • [11] GODIN, Danny; ZAHEDI, Mithra. Aspects of Research through Design: A Literature Review. In: Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference 2014. Umeå, Sweden: [s.n.], 2014.
  • [12] HATCHUEL, Armand; WEIL, Benoit. CK Design Theory: An Advanced Formulation. Research in Engineering Design - RES ENG DESIGN, v. 19, p. 181–192, 2009.
  • [13] JAPIASSU, Hilton. Nascimento da Ciência Moderna. In: Nascimento e morte das ciências humanas. Rio de Janeiro: F. Alves, p. 19–59, 1978.
  • [14] JAPIASSU, Hilton. A crise da razão e a revanche do irracional. DESAFIOS: Revista Interdisciplinar da Universidade Federal do Tocantins, v. 2, n. 2, p. 03, 2016.
  • [15] LAVILLE, Christian; DIONNE, Jean. A construção do saber: manual de metodologia da pesquisa em ciências humanas. Belo Horizonte: Ed. da UFMG: ARTMED, 1999.
  • [16] LE MASSON, Pascal; DORST, Kees; SUBRAHMANIAN, Eswaran. Design theory: history, state of the art and advancements. Research in Engineering Design, v. 24, n. 2, p. 97–103, 2013.
  • [17] MINAYO, Maria Cecilia de S.; SANCHES, Odécio. Quantitativo-qualitativo: oposição ou complementaridade? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 9, n. 3, p. 237–248, 1993.
  • [18] NAJAR, Rodrigo. Perspectivas epistemológicas e design: uma abordagem pós-estruturalista. Estudos em Design, v. 27, n. 1, p. 149–160, 2019.
  • [19] RITTEL, Horst W. J.; WEBBER, Melvin M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, v. 4, n. 2, p. 155–169, 1973.
  • [20] SCHÖN, Donald A. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. [s.l.]: Basic Books, 1983.
  • [21] SHAI, Offer; REICH, Yoram. Infused Design: I. Theory. Research in Engineering Design, v. 15, p. 93–107, 2004.
  • [22] SIMON, Herbert. As Ciências do Artificial. Trad. Luís Moniz Pereira. Coimbra: Almedina, 1981.
  • [23] SIMON, Herbert. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.
  • [24] SNOW, C. P. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Mansfield Centre, Conn.: Martino, 2013.
  • [25] STICKDORN, Marc; LAWRENCE, Adam; HORMESS, Markus; et al. Isto é Design de Serviço na Prática: Como Aplicar o Design de Serviço no Mundo Real: Manual do Praticante. Porto Alegre: Bookman Editora, 2019.
  • [26] STAPPERS, Pieter; GIACCARDI, Elisa. Research through Design. In: INTERACTION DESIGN
  • [27] FOUNDATION (Ed.). The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. [s.l.: s.n.], 2018, p. 84.
  • [28] SUH, Nam P. The principles of design. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. (Oxford series on advanced manufacturing, 6).
  • [29] VAN DIJCK, José. After the “Two Cultures”: Toward a “(Multi)cultural” Practice of Science Communication. Science Communication - SCI COMMUN, v. 25, p. 177–190, 2003.
  • [30] YOSHIKAWA, H. General Design Theory and a CAD System. In: SATA, Toshio; WARMAN, Ernest (Orgs.). Man-machine communication in CAD/CAM: proceedings of the IFIP WG5.2-5.3 Working Conference held in Tokyo, 1980. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co., 1981, p. 35–57.
Como citar:

Luccas, Lucas Ferreira; Magalhães, Cláudio de Freitas; "Design, pesquisa, ciência e academia:conflitos e aproximações", p-721-731. In: Anais do Colóquio Internacional de Design 2020. São Paulo: Blucher, 2020.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/cid2020-56

últimos 30 dias

151
downloads

312
visualizações

948
indexações