Outubro 2023 vol. 11 num. 4 - 15th International Conference of the European Academy of Design

Full paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Design Research towards socio-technical complex systems: A designerly systemic impact of Tourism value-chain

Design Research towards socio-technical complex systems: A designerly systemic impact of Tourism value-chain

Aulisio, Asja ; Barbero, Silvia ; Pereno, Amina ;

Full paper:

The willingness to investigate and increasingly tackle complex phenomena becomes a requirement that leads many researchers to move towards Design which deals more and more with Systems. This opens up the Design discipline to move towards the value chain level and also to lead and reframe newly established research domains. But how can we measure the impact that Design has on these new contexts at the meso scale? This paper suggests that to do so, we must start with needs directly arising from and outside the Academia, taking advantage of European funds to co-design with stakeholders by experimenting. The tourism value chain is the one selected, characterised by a highly complex and fragmented number of stakeholders and activities, marked by a business-as-usual model. Decision-makers are increasingly striving for a sustainable sector transition; hence the Design research community is advancing systemic reflections on co-creating sustainable and impactful strategies.

Full paper:

The willingness to investigate and increasingly tackle complex phenomena becomes a requirement that leads many researchers to move towards Design which deals more and more with Systems. This opens up the Design discipline to move towards the value chain level and also to lead and reframe newly established research domains. But how can we measure the impact that Design has on these new contexts at the meso scale? This paper suggests that to do so, we must start with needs directly arising from and outside the Academia, taking advantage of European funds to co-design with stakeholders by experimenting. The tourism value chain is the one selected, characterised by a highly complex and fragmented number of stakeholders and activities, marked by a business-as-usual model. Decision-makers are increasingly striving for a sustainable sector transition; hence the Design research community is advancing systemic reflections on co-creating sustainable and impactful strategies.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Systemic Design, Participatory Approach, Policy, Tourism Value-Chain,

Palavras-chave: Systemic Design, Participatory Approach, Policy, Tourism Value-Chain,

DOI: 10.5151/ead2023-4ESP-01Full-07Asja-Aulisio-et-al

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Battistoni C, Giraldo Nohra C, Barbero S. (2019) A Systemic Design Method to Approach Future Complex Scenarios and Research Towards Sustainability: A Holistic Diagnosis Tool. Sustainability. 11(16):4458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164458
  • [2] Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.
  • [3] https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
  • [4] Celaschi F., Formia E., Iñiguez Flores R., León Morán R., Design Processes and Anticipation, in: Handbook of Anticipation. Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making, Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 773 – 793
  • [5] Cross, Nigel. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-301-9.
  • [6] Dredge, D. (2022). Regenerative tourism: transforming mindsets, systems and practices. Journal of Tourism Futures, 8(3), 269–281. doi: 10.1108/JTF-01-2022-0015
  • [7] Knezevic Cvelbar, L., Antonucci, B., Cutrufo, N., Marongiu, L., Rodrigues, M., Teoh, T. (2021). Research for TRAN Committee – Relaunching transport and tourism in the EU after COVID-19 – Tourism sector, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels
  • [8] Gaziulusoy, İ., Veselova, E., Hodson, E., Berglund, E., Öztekin, E. E., Houtbeckers, E., Hernberg, H., Jalas, M., Fodor, K., & Ferreira, M. (2021). View of Design for Sustainability Transformations: A Deep Leverage Points Research Agenda for the (Post-)Pandemic Context. Strategic Design Research Journal, 13. http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2021.141.02/60748414
  • [9] Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6/7), 897-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
  • [10] Gianfrate, V., & Iñiguez Flores, R. (2022). Geographies of Design innovation: cultural drivers and global-local flows . Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, (77), 14. https://doi.org/30682/diid772022a
  • [11] Jones, P.H., & Kijima, K. (eds.) (2018), Systemic Design: Theory, Methods, and Practice. Tokyo, Japan: Springer.
  • [12] Hyysalo, S., Perikangas, S., Marttila, T., & Auvinen, K., (2019). Intermediate Codesigning in Transitions Governance: Catalysing and channelling participant action. Design Journal, 22(6), 873-894. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1661557
  • [13] Manzini, E. (2010). Small, Local, Open and Connected: Design for Social Innovation and Sustanability, The Journal of Design Strategies, 4(1), 8-11.
  • [14] Moreno, L. A., & Villalba, E. R. (2018). Transdisciplinary Design: Tamed complexity through new collaboration. Strategic Design Research Journal, 11(1), 42.
  • [15] Design Impact & Transition (DIT) Platform. (2021). The Design Impact Transition (DIT) platform: our narrative of change. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • [16] Pereno, A., Barbero, S. (2020). Systemic design for territorial enhancement: An overview on design tools supporting socio-technical system innovation. Strategic Design Research Journal. 13. 113-136. 10.4013/sdrj.2020.132.02.
  • [17] Peruccio, P., Vrenna, M., Menzardi, P., Savina, A. (2018), From “The limits to growth” to systemic design: Envisioning a sustainable future. In Cumulus Conference Proceedings Wuxi 2018 Diffused Transition and Design Opportunities, pp. 751-759.
  • [18] Pizzocaro, S. (2018), ‘Theory as habitus for scholarly design research’, Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 5:2, pp. 1.1–1.16, doi: 10.1386/art_00001_1
  • [19] Poleac D. (2023) Responsive Design Thinking: Transitioning from Human-Centered to a Planetary-Centric Approach to Innovation. Principles and Perspectives. In: Negrușa AL, Coroş MM (eds) Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19656-0_1
  • [20] Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration, Building Research & Information, 35:6, 674–680, doi: 10.1080/09613210701475753
  • [21] Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4, 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
  • [22] Sevaldson, B. (2022). Designing Complexity. The Methodology and Practice of Systems Oriented Design. Common Ground Research Networks, Champaign, Illinois.
  • [23] Stoddard J. E., Pollard C. E., & Evans M. R. (2012), The Triple Bottom Line: A Framework for Sustainable Tourism Development, International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 13:3, 233-258, doi: 10.1080/15256480.2012.698173
  • [24] Villari, B. (2021). The empathic (r)evolution. Lessons learned from Covid-19 to design at the community, organization, and governmental levels. Strategic Design Research Journal, 14(1), 187–198. doi:10.4013/sdrj.2021.141.16"
Como citar:

Aulisio, Asja; Barbero, Silvia; Pereno, Amina; "Design Research towards socio-technical complex systems: A designerly systemic impact of Tourism value-chain", p. 759-770 . In: 15th International Conference of the European Academy of Design. São Paulo: Blucher, 2023.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ead2023-4ESP-01Full-07Asja-Aulisio-et-al

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações