Dezembro 2021 vol. 9 num. 5 - 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research

Full Paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Designed Epistemology

Designed Epistemology

Karbowski, Arthur ; Fraher, Robert ;

Full Paper:

The reliance on linear, rational, Enlightenment philosophy to guide pedagogy and practice in knowledge creation, specifically in education and design, can sometimes lead to problems. This paper calls on Gödel’s incompleteness results to justify the use of design principles in building epistemology. An example of course design is examined using Jonas’ Research through Design framework (2014) and compared to Deleuze and Guattari’s idea of the rhizome. The question is raised whether philosophical and psychoanalytic theory can provide the framework for design theory.

Full Paper:

The reliance on linear, rational, Enlightenment philosophy to guide pedagogy and practice in knowledge creation, specifically in education and design, can sometimes lead to problems. This paper calls on Gödel’s incompleteness results to justify the use of design principles in building epistemology. An example of course design is examined using Jonas’ Research through Design framework (2014) and compared to Deleuze and Guattari’s idea of the rhizome. The question is raised whether philosophical and psychoanalytic theory can provide the framework for design theory.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Design theory, Philosophy, Scientific method, Research through Design,

Palavras-chave: Design theory, Philosophy, Scientific method, Research through Design,

DOI: 10.5151/ead2021-174

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "Barker, C. (2004). Enlightenment (the). In The SAGE Dictionary of Cultural Studies (p. 60). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • [2] Barker, C. (2004). Modernity. In The SAGE Dictionary of Cultural Studies (p. 126). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • [3] Britannica School. (n.d.). Science. In Britannica School Elementary. Retrieved August 26, 2021, from https://school-eb-com.ezproxy.lib.uwstout.edu/levels/elementary/article/science/353748#253775.
  • [4] Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056.
  • [5] Buchanan, R. (2007). Anxiety, Wonder and Astonishment: The Communion of Art and Design. Design Issues, 23(4), 39–4 https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2007.23.4.39.
  • [6] Burbules, N. (2014). Wittgenstein, Ludwig. In D. Phillips (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosphy vol. 1 (pp. 854-855). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • [7] Chen, Y.-Z. (2004). Edgar Morin's Paradigm of Complexity adn Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem. World Futures, 421-431.
  • [8] Chow, R. (2015). Platform and Habit of Inquiry. Constructivist Foundations, 11(1), 31–32.
  • [9] Chow, R., & Jonas, W. (2010). Case Transfer: A Design Approach by Artifacts and Projection. Design Issues, 26(4), 9–1
  • [10] Cooke, B. (2009). Russell, Bertrand. In H. Birx (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Time: Science, Philosophy, Theology, and Culture (pp. 1121-1122). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • [11] Dolciani, M., Beckenbach, E., Donnelly, A., Jurgensen, R., & Wooton, W. (1974). Modern Introductory Analysis. Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • [12] Engley, R., & McGowan, T. (Hosts). (2018, October 29). Rupture [Audio podcast episode]. In Why Theory. Todd McGowan and Ryan Engley. https://m.soundcloud.com/whytheory.
  • [13] Funk and Wagnalls. (2018). Scientific Method. In New World Encyclopedia. Retrieved August 26, 2021, from http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.uwstout.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=3&sid=f5350500-b6ee-434a-bfe9-c18b81742ce5%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=sc063300&db=funk.
  • [14] Hatchuel, A. W. (2013). Towards an Ontology of Design: Lessons from C-K Design Theory and Forcing. Research in Engineering Design, 147-163.
  • [15] Irwin, T. (2019). The Emerging Transition Design Approach. Cuadernos Del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación, 19(73), 149–181.
  • [16] Jonas, W. (2001). A scenario for design. Design Issues, 17(2), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152383796.
  • [17] Jonas, W. (2014). The strengths / limits of Systems Thinking denote the strengths / limits of Practice-Based Design Research. FORMakademisk, 7(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.789.
  • [18] Jörg, T. D. (2007). Towards a New, Complexity Science of Learning and Education. Educational Research Review, 145-156.
  • [19] Jung, C.G. (1957). The Undiscovered Self. Signet Psychology.
  • [20] Linton, G. (2009). Gödel, Kurt. In H. Birx (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Time: Science, Philosophy, Theology, and Culture (p. 610). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • [21] Nickles, T. (2013). Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism. In B. Kaldis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences (pp. 562-564). SAGE Publications.
  • [22] Rundle, B. (2006). Modern Logic: from Frege to Gödel: Hilbert and Formalism. In D. M. Borchert (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2nd ed., vol. 5 (pp. 469-470). Macmillan Reference USA.
  • [23] Teal, R. (2010). Developing a (Non-linear) Practice of Design Thinking. Journal of Art and Design Education, 294-302. "
Como citar:

Karbowski, Arthur; Fraher, Robert; "Designed Epistemology", p. 149-156 . In: 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ead2021-174

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações