Outubro 2023 vol. 11 num. 4 - 15th International Conference of the European Academy of Design

Full paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Designing Pluriverse Knowledge in Design Research: The Case of the 8th International Forum of Design as a Process

Designing Pluriverse Knowledge in Design Research: The Case of the 8th International Forum of Design as a Process

Formia, Elena Maria ; Lupo, Eleonora ; Mehmeti, Lorela ;

Full paper:

The global knowledge ecosystem is affected by ethnocentrism and witnesses Western monopolies of knowledge that built hegemonic structures and narratives. The paper proposes a vision that shifts from processes of knowledge power and control to processes of knowledge ownership and leadership through new international interactions based on increased accessibility and visibility in design publications. The idea of building a design network between Latin countries led to the foundation of the Latin Network for the Development of Design Processes. The 8th International Forum Design as a Process represents a testbed for this new experimentation of community-led knowledge targeting the Latin Network and Global South countries. The research presents a new frame of knowledge accessibility based on different assessment values that acknowledge the intertwin of cultural identity and vernacular design, in favour of equity and inclusivity.

Full paper:

The global knowledge ecosystem is affected by ethnocentrism and witnesses Western monopolies of knowledge that built hegemonic structures and narratives. The paper proposes a vision that shifts from processes of knowledge power and control to processes of knowledge ownership and leadership through new international interactions based on increased accessibility and visibility in design publications. The idea of building a design network between Latin countries led to the foundation of the Latin Network for the Development of Design Processes. The 8th International Forum Design as a Process represents a testbed for this new experimentation of community-led knowledge targeting the Latin Network and Global South countries. The research presents a new frame of knowledge accessibility based on different assessment values that acknowledge the intertwin of cultural identity and vernacular design, in favour of equity and inclusivity.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: "Knowledge Ecosystem, Endemic, Global South, Research Access, Equity ",

Palavras-chave: "Knowledge Ecosystem, Endemic, Global South, Research Access, Equity ",

DOI: 10.5151/ead2023-2SAO-01Full-02Elena-Maria-Formia-et-al

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Adema, J., & Kiesewetter, R. (2022). Experimental Book Publishing: Reinventing Editorial Workflows and Engaging Communities. Commonplace, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.21428/6ffd8432.8998ab82
  • [2] Alvelos, H., & Barreto, S. (2022). Contributions towards a plurality in design narratives: Addressing dynamics between global and local discourses. The Design Journal, 25(6), 934–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022125731
  • [3] Bailey, M., Sams, P., Spencer, N., & Bentham, A. (2016). What on earth is responsible innovation anyway? (and how to make it happen). In E. Bohemia, L. Buck, K. Eriksen, A. Kovacevic, N. Ovesen, & C. Tollestrup (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (pp. 234–239). Glasgow: The Design Society.
  • [4] Boast, R., Bravo, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Return to Babel: Emergent Diversity, Digital Resources, and Local Knowledge. The Information Society, 23(5), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240701575635
  • [5] Buchanan, R. (2001). Human Dignity and Human Rights: Thoughts on the Principles of Human Design Issues. Design Issues, 17(3), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357178
  • [6] Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2006). “Mode 3”: Meaning and Implications from a Knowledge Systems Perspective. In E. G. Carayannis, & D. F. J. Campbell (Eds.), Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters: A Comparative Systems Approach Across the United States, Europe, and Asia (pp. 1–25). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
  • [7] Cash-Gibson, L., Guerra, G., & Salgado-de-Snyder, V. N. (2015). SDH-NET: a South–North-South collaboration to build sustainable research capacities on social determinants of health in low- and middle-income countries. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0048-1
  • [8] Celaschi, F. (2022). Editorial. Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, 77, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30682/diid772022%x
  • [9] Chan, A. S. (2014). Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • [10] Comaroff, J., Comaroff, J. L. (2012). Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa. Anthropological Forum, 22(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/1080/00664677.2012.694169
  • [11] Declaration of Research assessment-DORA. (2013). San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. https://sfdora.org/read/
  • [12] Escobar, A. (2017). Sustaining the Pluriverse: The Political Ontology of Territorial Struggles in Latin America. In M. Brightman, & J. Lewis (Eds.), The Anthropology of Sustainability: Beyond Development and Progress (pp. 237–256). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
  • [13] Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • [14] Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • [15] Fathers, J. (2003). Peripheral Vision: An Interview with Gui Bonsiepe Charting a Lifetime of Commitment to Design Empowerment. Design Issues, 19(4), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793603322545055
  • [16] Fecher, B., Friesike, S., Hebing, M., & Linek, S. (2017). A reputation economy: how individual reward considerations trump systemic arguments for open access to data. Palgrave Communications, 3, Article 17051. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.51
  • [17] Fernández, S., & Bonsiepe, G. (Eds.). (2008). Historia del diseño in América Latina y el Caribe Industrialización y comunicación visual para la autonomía. São Paulo: Editora Blücher.
  • [18] Fiormonte, D., & Priego, E. (2016). Knowledge Monopolies and Global Academic Publishing. The Winnower. https://thewinnower.com/papers/4965-knowledge-monopolies-and-global-academic-publishing
  • [19] Fiormonte, D. (2017). Digital Humanities and the Geopolitics of Knowledge. Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, 7(1), 1–18. http://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.274
  • [20] Fiormonte, D., Chaudhuri, S., & Ricaurte, P. (Eds.). (2022). Global debates in the digital humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • [21] Formia, E., & Peruccio, P. P. (2011). Design associations in Latin countries: Tradition, identity, and new perspectives in the ICT era. Strategic Design Research Journal, 4(1), 14–20. http://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2011.41.03
  • [22] Formia, E. M. (2015). Lavorare con la storia tra «centro e periferia»: un’esperienza latino-americana [Working with history between “center and periphery”: a Latin American experience]. In P. P. Peruccio, & D. Russo, STORIA HIC ET NUNC: La formazione dello storico del design in Italia e all’estero (pp. 182–197). Torino: Umberto Allemandi.
  • [23] Friesike, S., & Lupo, E. (2022). Changing Academic Structures and Liberating Research: An Interview with Sascha Friesike. Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, 78, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.30682/diid7822d
  • [24] Fry, A. (1995). A Geography of Power: Design History and Marginality. In R. Buchanan, & V. Margolin (Eds.), The Idea of Design: a Design Issues Reader (pp. 204–218). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • [25] Fry, T. (2017). Design for/by “The Global South”. Design Philosophy Papers, 15(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2017.1303242
  • [26] Gandini, A. (2016). The Reputation Economy: Understanding Knowledge Work in Digital Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • [27] Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
  • [28] Iñiguez Flores, R., & Gianfrate, V. (2022). Geographies of Design Innovation: Cultural Drivers and Global-Local Flows. Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, 77, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.30682/diid772022a
  • [29] Kieńć, W. (2017). Authors from the periphery countries choose open access more often. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1093
  • [30] Kwandhala, A. (2019, June 5). What Does It Mean to Decolonize Design? Dismantling design history 101. Eye on Design. https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/what-does-it-mean-to-decolonize-design/
  • [31] Larivière, V., & Desrochers, N. (2015, November 18). Langues et diffusion de la recherche: le cas des sciences humaines et sociales [Languages and dissemination of research: the case of the humanities and social sciences]. Le magazine de l’Acfas. https://www.acfas.ca/publications/magazine/2015/11/langues-diffusion-recherche-cas-sciences-humaines-socials
  • [32] Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
  • [33] Leitão, R. M., Noel L., & Murphy, L. (2020). Proceedings of Pivot 2020: Designing a World of Many Centers. London: Design Research Society. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/conference-volumes/37
  • [34] Leitão, R. M., Noel, L. (2022). Special Forum: Designing a World of Many Centers. Design and Culture, 14(3), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2022.2110796
  • [35] Lupo, E. (2022). Changing Scientific Production in Design. Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, 78, 10–23. https://doi.org/10.30682/diid7822a
  • [36] Mabey, C., Kulich C. & Lorenzi-Cioldi F. (2012). Knowledge leadership in global scientific research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(12), 2450–2467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.668386
  • [37] Margolin, V. (2007). Design, the Future and the Human Spirit. Design Issues, 23(3), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2007.23.3.4
  • [38] Mehmeti, L. (2022). Is There a South-North Knowledge Gap? Diid — Disegno Industriale Industrial Design, 78, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.30682/diid7822h
  • [39] Mignolo, W. (2012). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • [40] Mignolo, W. (2013). On Pluriversality. http://waltermignolo.com/on-pluriversality/
  • [41] Mignolo, W. (2018). Foreword: On Pluriversality and Multipolarity. In B. Reiter (Ed.), Constructing the Pluriverse: The Geopolitics of Knowledge (pp. ix–xvi). Durham: Duke University Press.
  • [42] Nicholas, D., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Watkinson, A., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Herman, E., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., & Świgoń, M. (2017). Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102
  • [43] St John, N. (2022). Designing on Western Arrarnta Country: The Ntaria Digital Drawings. Design and Culture, 14(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2022.2106348
  • [44] Noel, L., & Leitão, R. (2018). Editorial: Not Just From the Centre. In C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - Proceedings of DRS 2018 International Conference, Vol. 1. London: Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2017.006
  • [45] Peters, M. A. (2015). Interview with Pierre A. Lévy, French philosopher of collective intelligence. Open Review of Educational Research, 2(1), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2015.1084477
  • [46] Reiter, B. (Ed.). (2018). Constructing the Pluriverse: The Geopolitics of knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002017
  • [47] World Bank (2023). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
Como citar:

Formia, Elena Maria; Lupo, Eleonora; Mehmeti, Lorela; "Designing Pluriverse Knowledge in Design Research: The Case of the 8th International Forum of Design as a Process", p. 280-293 . In: 15th International Conference of the European Academy of Design. São Paulo: Blucher, 2023.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ead2023-2SAO-01Full-02Elena-Maria-Formia-et-al

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações