Agosto 2017 vol. 3 num. 6 - SBDS + ISSD 2017

Artigo Completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

Dialogue interaction as a design tool for academic research. A case study of UFRJ’s extension project on future of food with the youth from periphery

Afonso, Rita ; Bartholo, Roberto ; Carvalho, Cristine ; Klein, Dorothea ; Bursztyn, Ivan ;

Artigo Completo:

The paper presents the research project “Food 2.0: Sustainable Food Futures - young people’s views from Rio and London”, designed to disclose the views of young people living in the peripheries of Rio de Janeiro and London on their food futures. The project was conceived and implemented in dialogical and participatory way using new technologies of information and communication. It was part of university extension activities from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).

Artigo Completo:

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: University Extension; Design for social action; Food; Participatory research,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/sbds-issd-2017-005

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] AZEVEDO, E; PELICIONI, M.C.F.. Promoção da Saúde, Sustentabilidade e Agroecologia: uma discussão intersetorial. Rev. Saúde Soc., v.20, n.3, p.715-729, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 201
  • [2] BARLETT, P. F.. Campus Sustainable Food Projects: Critique and Engagement. American Anthropologist, 113: 101–115, 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1548- 1433.2010.01309.x
  • [3] BARTHOLO, R.; AFONSO, R.; PEREIRA, I..Report: Leveraging Buying Power for Development: Ethical Consumption and Sustainable Procurement in Chile and Brazil. Rio de Janeiro:LTDS/COPPE/UFRJ, 2012.
  • [4] CONTREAS, J.. In CANESQUI, A.M.; GARCIA, R. W.D. (orgs). Antropologia e Nutrição um diálogo possível. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ, 2005.
  • [5] COTTE, J; TRUDEL, R.. Socially conscious consumerism: A systematic review of the body of knowledge. MIT Sloan Management Review; Cambridge 50.2 : 61-68, Winter, 2009.
  • [6] INSTITUTO ALANA. O Instituto. Available at http://www.alana.org.br/Institucional/Instituto.aspx Acessed Jan/2017.
  • [7] MARGOLIN, V., & MARGOLIN, S. A “social model” of design: Issues of practice and research. Design Issues, 18(4), 24-30, 2002.
  • [8] MINTZ, S. Comida e antropologia: uma breve revisão. Rev Bras. de Ciências Sociais, vol. 16, nº 47, out., 2001.
  • [9] PAPANEK, V.. Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Chicago, IL: Academy Chicago Publishers, 1985.
  • [10] PETRINI, C. Slow Food: princípios da nova gastronomia. São Paulo: SENAC, 2009.
  • [11] PINGALI, P. L.. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 31 July 2012, Vol.109(31), pp.12302-8, 2012.
  • [12] PORTILHO, F.. Consumo, sustentabilidade e cidadania. 2a edição. São Paulo: Cortez Editora, 2005.
  • [13] VIA CAMPESINA. The right to produce and access to land. Position of the Via Campesina on Food Sovereignty presented at the World Food Summit, Rome, Italy, p. 13-17, 1996.
  • [14] WHITE, S. (Ed.). Participatory video: Images that transform and empower. London: Sage. 2003.
Como citar:

Afonso, Rita; Bartholo, Roberto; Carvalho, Cristine; Klein, Dorothea; Bursztyn, Ivan; "Dialogue interaction as a design tool for academic research. A case study of UFRJ’s extension project on future of food with the youth from periphery", p. 25-30 . In: Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Design Sustentável e International Symposium on Sustainable Design 2017. São Paulo: Blucher, 2017.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/sbds-issd-2017-005

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações