Maio 2022 vol. 9 num. 1 - VI Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação

Artigo - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Dinâmica do crescimento da produtividade do trabalho na indústria de transformação brasileira segundo o porte das empresas – 1997 a 2018

Dynamics of labor productivity growth in the Brazilian manufacturing industry by size – 1997 to 2018

Silva, Ariana Cericatto da ; Botelho, Marisa dos Reis Azevedo ;

Artigo:

O artigo tem por objetivo analisar a dinâmica de evolução da produtividade da indústria de transformação brasileira considerando as faixas de tamanho das empresas. Para a análise se utilizou de dados da Pesquisa Industrial Anual, por meio de uma tabulação especial. Empregou-se um horizonte amplo de análise, do ano de 1997 a 2018, período ainda pouco explorado na literatura e utilizou-se o método shift-share para decompor o crescimento da produtividade do trabalho da indústria de transformação brasileira, sob o enfoque do tamanho das empresas (entre os portes e intra porte). Os resultados demonstraram que as pequenas empresas apresentaram uma melhor dinâmica de mudança estrutural, tanto em relação aos outros portes como internamente. Com isso, verificou-se uma sinalização de melhora do desempenho produtivo nos menores portes, ou seja, os resultados indicam uma diminuição, embora sutil, da brecha produtiva por parte das pequenas e médias empresas.

Artigo:

The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the dynamics of productivity evolution of the Brazilian manufacturing industry considering the size ranges of companies. For the analysis, data from the Annual Industrial Survey was used, through a special tabulation. A broad horizon of time was used, from 1997 to 2018, a period still little explored in the literature, and the shift-share method was used to decompose the growth of industrial labor productivity in the Brazilian industry, focusing on the size of the companies (between sizes and intra-size). The results showed that small companies showed a better dynamic of structural change both among other sizes and internally. Thus, there was a sign of improvement in productive performance in smaller sizes, that is, the results indicate a decrease, although subtle, in the productive gap on the part of small and medium-sized companies.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Produtividade do trabalho; Indústria de Transformação; Porte de empresas; Shift-share,

Palavras-chave: Labor productivity; Manufacturing industry; Size of companies; Shift-share,

DOI: 10.5151/vi-enei-816

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] AIGINGER, K.; RODRIK, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first
  • [2] century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, p. 1-19.
  • [3] ANDREONI, A. (2016). ‘Varieties of Industrial Policy: Models, Packages and Transformation Cycles’,
  • [4] in Akbar Noman and Joseph E. Stiglitz (eds) Efficiency, Finance, and Varieties of Industrial Policy.
  • [5] New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 245–30
  • [6] ANDREONI, A. (2020). Technical change, the Shifting Terrain of the ‘Industrial’ and Digital Industrial
  • [7] Policy. In: CHANG, H-J.; CRAMER, C.; KOZULWRIGHT, R.; OQUBAY, A. (ed.). The Oxford
  • [8] Handbook of Industrial Policy. Oxford University Press.
  • [9] ANDREONI, A.; CHANG, H. (2017) ‘Bringing Production and Employment back into Development’,
  • [10] Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10 (1): 173-87.
  • [11] ANDREONI, A.; CHANG, H. (2019) ‘The Political Economy of Industrial Policy:Structural Interdependencies, Policy Alignment and Conflict Management’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 48: 136-50.
  • [12] ANDREONI A.; CHANG, H.-J. (2019) The Political Economy of Industrial Policy: Structural Interdependencies, Policy Alignment and Conflict Management. In: ANDREONI, A.; CHANG, H.-J.; SCAZZIERI, R. (ed.). Structural change and economic dynamics, v. 48, p. 136-150. (Special Issue: Frontiers of Industrial Policy: Structures, Institutions and Policies).
  • [13] AMSDEN, A.H. (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • [14] ARAÚJO, B. P.; WILLCOX, L. D. (2017), Reflexões Críticas sobre a Experiência Brasileira de Política Industrial no Setor Eólico, Rio de Janeiro, BNDES Setorial.
  • [15] AUSSILLOUX, V.; FROCRAIN, P.; LALLEMENT, R.; TABARLY, G.; HARFI, M. (2020) Industrial policies in France Developments and international comparisons. Commissioner General of France Stratégie. Note de synthèse. Déc, 2020.
  • [16] BEST, M.H. (2018) How Growth Really Happens: The Making of Economic Miracles through Production, Governance, and Skills. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • [17] BONVILLIAN, W.B. (2021) Emerging Industrial Policy Approaches in the United States. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, oct.
  • [18] BORRUS, M.; ZYSMAN, J. (1997) “Wintelism and the Changing Terms of Global Competition: Prototype of the Future?”, BRIE Working Paper 96B, pp. 1-23.
  • [19] KENNEY, M.; ZYSMAN, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32 (3): 61-69. Kenney, M., P., Rouvinen, T., Seppälä, J., Zysman. 20 Platforms and industrial change, Industry and Innovation. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.201602514
  • [20] CIMOLI, M.; DOSI, G.; NELSON. R. R.; STIGLITZ J. (2007). Instituições e políticas moldando o desenvolvimento industrial: uma nota introdutória. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, RJ, vol. 6 (1).
  • [21] CHANG, H.-J. (1994) The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London: Macmillan.
  • [22] CHEN, L & NAUGHTON, B. (2016). An institutionalized policy-making mechanism: China’s return to techno-industrial policy, Research Policy 45 (10), 2138-2152.
  • [23] CHICK, V. (2018) Industrial policy, then and now, real-world economics review, issue no. 84, 19 June 2018, pp. 178-188. Em:http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue84/Chick84.pdf. Acesso em: out, 2021.
  • [24] COUTINHO, L.G.; FERRAZ, J.C.; KUPFER, D.; PENNA, C. (coord.) (2018). Mapa de Clusters Tecnológicos e Tecnologias Relevantes para a Competitividade de Sistemas Produtivos. Documento Interno de Trabalho. Rio de Janeiro, IE-UFRJ; Campinas, IE-Unicamp.
  • [25] DAUDT, G.M.; WILLCOX, L.D. (2016) Reflexões críticas a partir das experiências dos Estados Unidos e da Alemanha em manufatura avançada. BNDES Setorial, n. 44, p.5-45, set. 2016.
  • [26] DIEGUES, A.C.; ROSELINO, ‪J.E. (2020) Editorial - Política Industrial e Indústria 4.0: a retomada do debate em um cenário de transformações no paradigma tecnoprodutivo. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 19.‬‬‬‬‬‬
  • [27] DIEGUES, A.C.; ROSELINO, J.E. (2022). Industrial policy, techno-nationalism and industry 4.0: technological war between China and USA. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY (prelo).
  • [28] DOSI, G., PAVITT, K.,; SOETE, L. (1990). The economics of technical change and international trade. LEM Book Series.
  • [29] DURAND, C.; MILBERG, W. (2019) ‘Intellectual Monopoly in Global Value Chains’, Review of International Political Economy 27(2): 1–26.
  • [30] EDQUIST, C. (2019) Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model?, Research Policy, Elsevier, vol 48, issue 4, 2019, pages 869-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008.
  • [31] FERREIRA, M.J.B. (2021) Indústria Aeronáutica Brasileira: as especificidades de um modelo nacional de inserção global. In.: DIEGUES, A.C.; SARTI, F. (Org.) Brasil: Indústria e Desenvolvimento em um cenário de transformação do paradigma tecnoprodutivo. Curitiba : CRV | Campinas, SP: Unicamp. IE.
  • [32] ERNST, D. (2014). Upgrading India's Electronics Manufacturing Industry: Regulatory Reform and Industrial Policy (February 12, 2014). East-West Center Special Study, 2014,
  • [33] EVANS, P.B. (1995) Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: University Press.
  • [34] FREEMAN, C. (1995); The “National System of Innovation” in Historical Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics v.19, n.1.
  • [35] FURTADO, C. (1961) Desenvolvimento e subdesenvolvimento. Editora Fundo de Cultura.
  • [36] GEREFFI, G. HUMPHEY, J.; STURGEON, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains, Review of International Political Economy, 12 (1): 78-104.
  • [37] GEREFFI, G. (2014) Global Value chains in a Post-Washington Consensus World, Review of International Political Economy, 21 (1): 9-
  • [38] HAMILTON, A. (1791) Report on Manufactures, 1791.
  • [39] HIDALGO, C.A.; HAUSMANN, R. (2009) The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 106, n. 26, p. 10570-10575.
  • [40] HIRSCHMAN, A.(1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: YaleUniversity Press,
  • [41] HORST, J.; SANTIAGO, F. (2018), “What can policy makers learn from Germany’s Industrie 4.0 development strategy?” UNIDO Working Paper 22/2018.
  • [42] HUMPHREY, J. (2004). Upgrading in global value chains. Geneva, ILO.
  • [43] JOHNSON, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • [44] KAGERMANN, H.; ANDERL, R.; GAUSEMEIER, J.; SCHUH, G.; WAHLSTER, W. (2016) Industrie 4.0 in a Global Context: Strategies for Cooperating with International Partners. Acatech STUDY, Munich: Herbert Utz Verlag.
  • [45] KALDOR, N. (1966) Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • [46] LABRUNIE, M.L.; PENNA, C.C.R.; KUPFER, D. (2020) The resurgence of industrial policies in the age of advanced manufacturing: an international comparison of industrial policy documents. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, ISSN 2178-2822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8658753.
  • [47] LEE, K. (2019) The art of economic catch-up: barriers, detours and leapfrogging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • [48] LEE, K.-F (2019). AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley and the New World Order. Bus Econ, v. 54, n. 3, p. 185-190.
  • [49] LIN, J.Y. (2011) New structural economics: a framework for rethinking development. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series, 5197.
  • [50] LIST, G.F. (1841) Sistema nacional de economia política. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1989. [1841].
  • [51] LUNDVALL, B. (1992); National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London Pinter.
  • [52] MANYIKA, J. et al. (2013) Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. San Francisco, CA: McKinsey Global Institute.
  • [53] MAZZUCATO, M (2013). The entrepreneurial state: debunking the public vs. private myths in risk and innovation.Anthem Press
  • [54] MAZZUCATO, M.; KATTEL, R.; RYAN-COLLINS, J. Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit. J Ind Compet Trade, v. 20, p. 421-437, 2020.
  • [55] MYRDAL, G. (1968). Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York: Pantheon.
  • [56] NAUDÉ, W. (2010). Industrial policy: old and new issues. UNU-WIDER, Working Paper Nº 2010/106.
  • [57] NAUGHTON, B. (2021). The rise of China´s industrial policy, 1978-2020, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Economia.
  • [58] NELSON, R.R. (ed.) (1993); National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • [59] NELSON, R., SAMPAT, B., 2001. Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 44, 31–54.
  • [60] NELSON R.R. (2008). ‘What Enables Rapid Economic Progress? What are the Needed Institutions?’, Research Policy, 37:1, 1-11.
  • [61] NISHIJIMA, S. (2012) Japanese Industrial Policy. Perspective of the World. v. 4, n. 3, dec. 2012.
  • [62] OECD (2017). The Next Production Revolution: Implications for Governments and Business. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017.
  • [63] OQUBAY, A.; CRAMER, C.; CHANG, H-J.; KOZUL-WRIGHT, R. (2020). Introduction to Industrial Policy and Development. In: OQUBAY, A.; CRAMER, C.; CHANG, H-J.; KOZUL-WRIGHT, R. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Industrial Policy. Oxford University Press.
  • [64] PREBISCH, R. (1949) O desenvolvimento econômico da América Latina e alguns de seus principais problemas. In: BIELSCHOWSKY, R. (org.). Cinquenta anos de pensamento na CEPAL. Rio de Janeiro, Cofecon-Cepal; Record, 2000. [1949]. v. 1.
  • [65] PWC (2021). Megatrends: 5 global shifts changing the way we live and do business. Disponível em: https://www.pwc.co.uk/issues/megatrends.html. Acesso em: out, 2021.
  • [66] RODRIK, D. (2007). Normalizing industrial policy. September.
  • [67] SALLES FILHO, S.; STEFANUTO, G.; MATTOS, C.; ZEITOUM, C.; CAMPOS, F. (2012). Avaliação de impactos da Lei de Informática: uma análise da política industrial e de incentivo à inovação no setor de TICs brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Campinas, SP, v. 11, p. 191–218,.
  • [68] SCHUMPETER, J. (1934) Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press.
  • [69] SMITH, A. (1776) Investigação sobre a natureza e as causas da riqueza das nações. SP: Ed. Abril, 1984.
  • [70] STIGLITZ, J.; GREENWALD, B. (2015) Creating a learning society: a new approach to growth, development, and social progress. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • [71] SUZIGAN, W.; VILLELA, A.V. (1997). Industrial Policy in Brazil. Campinas: IE/UNICAMP.
  • [72] SUZIGAN, W.; FURTADO, J. (2010) Instituições e políticas industriais e tecnológicas: reflexões a partir da experiência brasileira, Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo) 40(1), março.
  • [73] TEECE, D.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7. (Aug.), pp. 509-533.
  • [74] TEECE, D. (2019). China and the Reshaping of the Auto Industry: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Management and Organization Review, 15(1), 177-199. doi:10.1017/mor.2019.4
  • [75] UN (2020). The 'Report of the UN Economist Network for the UN 75th Anniversary: Shaping the Trends of Our Time'. Executive Summary, Sep 16, 2020.
  • [76] WADE, R. (1990). Governing the Market, Princeton, Princeton University Press
  • [77] WHITE HOUSE (2021). Building resilient supply chains, revitalizing American manufacturing, and fostering broad-based growth. 100-Day Reviews under Executive Order 14017. 250 p. A Report by The White House, 2021. páginas 6-18 Executive Summary.
  • [78] WONGLIMPIYARAT, J. (2016). "Government policies towards Israel's high-tech powerhouse," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 52, pages 18-27.
Como citar:

Silva, Ariana Cericatto da; Botelho, Marisa dos Reis Azevedo; "Dinâmica do crescimento da produtividade do trabalho na indústria de transformação brasileira segundo o porte das empresas – 1997 a 2018", p. 82-96 . In: Anais do VI Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação (ENEI): “Indústria e pesquisa para Inovação: novos desafios ao desenvolvimento sustentável”. São Paulo: Blucher, 2022.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/vi-enei-816

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações