Blucher Design Proceedings

Outubro 2021, vol.9, num.1 - 10º Congresso Internacional de Design da Informação e 10º Congresso Nacional de Iniciação Científica em Design
Full Paper - Open Access Idioma principal | Segundo principal

Dinâmicas colaborativas de discussão visual: um mapeamento sistemático

Collaborative dynamics of visual discussion: a systematic mapping

Bertoso, Luciana da Silva; Moraes, Reinaldo Pereira de; Padovani, Stephania

Full Paper:

Este artigo aborda, sob a ótica do Design da Informação, a prática do pensamento visual (visual thinking) por meio da elaboração de representações gráficas na organização e expressão de informações. Nesse contexto, o objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar um mapeamento sistemático sobre como as dinâmicas colaborativas de discussão visual têm sido praticadas nos últimos dez anos. Para isso, a Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática (RBS) foi adotada como procedimento metodológico. Os termos graphic facilitation, joint drawing e collaborative drawing foram pesquisados no Portal de Periódicos da CAPES, sendo aceitos, como resultados desta busca, os artigos revisados por pares publicados a partir de 2010. Os resultados foram organizados e descritos quanto ao tipo de comunicação estabelecida entre os participantes, quantidade e faixa etária dos envolvidos na dinâmica, tipo de suporte oferecido para a elaboração da representação, áreas de conhecimento nas quais as dinâmicas foram aplicadas e como a representação gráfica foi utilizada.

This paper addresses, from the perspective of Information Design, the practice of visual thinking through the elaboration of graphic representations in the organization and expression of information. In this context, this work aims to present a systematic mapping on how the collaborative dynamics of visual discussion have been practiced in the last ten years. For this, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was adopted as a methodological procedure. The terms graphic facilitation, joint design and collaborative design were searched on the Portal of Journals of the CAPES, and were accepted, as the results of this search, the peer-reviewed papers published from 2010. The results were organized and described in terms of the type of communication between the participants, the quantity and age range of people involved in dynamics, the type of support offered for the elaboration of the representation, areas of knowledge in which the dynamics were applied and how graphic representation was used.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/cidicongic2021-006-355052-CIDI-Comunicacao_a.pdf

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • [2] Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2010). Rich pictures: a means to explore the ‘Sustainable Group Mind’.
  • [3] In: The 16th annual international sustainable development research conference, 30 May - 01
  • [4] Jun 2010, Hong Kong, China.
  • [5] Bobek, E., & Tversky, B.(2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cogn.
  • [6] Research 1, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6
  • [7] Brendtro, L., Brokenleg, M., & van Bockern, S. (2002). Reclaiming youth at risk: Our hope for
  • [8] the future. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
  • [9] Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Cafe: Shaping our futures through conversations that
  • [10] matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koelher.
  • [11] Brouwer, H., Woodhill, J, Hemmati M., Verhoosel, K, Vugt, S. V. (2019) The MSP Guide: How to
  • [12] design and facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships. United Kingdom: Practical Action
  • [13] Publishing.
  • [14] Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.
  • [15] Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
  • [16] Cyrs, T. E. (1997). Visual thinking: let them see what you are saying. New directions for
  • [17] teaching and learning, n. 71, Fall, pp. 27-32.
  • [18] Engelhardt, Y. (2002). The Language of Graphics: a framework for the analysis of syntax and
  • [19] meaning in maps, charts and diagrams. Amsterdam: ILLC- Publications.
  • [20] Espiner, D.; & Hartnett, F. (2016). Innovation and graphic facilitation. Aotearoa New Zealand
  • [21] Social Work Review, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 4, p. 44–53. DOI 10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss4id298.
  • [22] Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: Theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY:Basic
  • [23] Books.
  • [24] Gavron, T. (2013). Meeting on Common Ground: Assessing Parent–Child Relationships
  • [25] Through the Joint Painting Procedure, Art Therapy, 30:1, 12-19, DOI:
  • [26] 10.1080/07421656.2013.757508
  • [27] Islim, O. F. (2018). Technology-supported collaborative concept maps in classrooms. Active
  • [28] Learning in Higher Education. v19, no. 2, p.131-143.
  • [29] Knight, L., McArdle, F., Cumming, T., Bone, J., Li, L., Peterken, C., & Ridgway, A. (2015).
  • [30] Intergenerational collaborative drawing: a research method for researching with/about young
  • [31] children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, vol. 40, no. 4, p. 21-29.
  • [32] Lai, SS., Tsai, CH., Wu, CC., Chen, CT., Li,HJ., & Chen, KL. (2020). Identifying the Cognitive
  • [33] Correlates of Reciprocity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord
  • [34] 50, 2007–2018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03957-7
  • [35] McKim, R.H. (1980). Experiences in visual thinking. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  • [36] Moreira, A. E. C., Oliveira, K. L., & Scacchetti F. A. P. (2016). O processo de ensino e
  • [37] aprendizagem em questão: implicações metodológicas e motivacionais. Educação Unisinos.
  • [38] v. 20, n. 1, p. 106-116.
  • [39] Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). A teoria subjacente aos mapas conceituais e como
  • [40] elaborá-los e usá-los. Práxis Educativa, 5(1), 9–29.
  • [41] Park, J., & Kang, JR. (2018). Assessing the Six-Member Collaborative Drawing Technique with
  • [42] the Collaborative Art Elements Scale. Arts in Psychotherapy, v. 59, p. 75–82.
  • [43] Prewitt, V. (2011). Working in the café: lessons in group dialogue. The Learning Organization,
  • [44] Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 189-202.
  • [45] Ravetz, J., & Ravetz, A. (2017). Seeing the wood for the trees: Social Science 3.0 and the role
  • [46] of visual thinking. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, v. 30, n. 1, p. 104–
  • [47] 120. DOI 10.1080/13511610.2016.1224155.
  • [48] Roam. D. (2009). The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures.
  • [49] Penguin Group, New York.
  • [50] Rosen, M., Pitre, R., & Johnson, D. R. (2016). Developmental Transformations Art Therapy: An
  • [51] Embodied, Interactional Approach, Art Therapy, 33:4, 195-202, DOI:
  • [52] 10.1080/07421656.2016.1229514
  • [53] Sakr, M. (2019). Young Children Drawing Together on the iPad Versus Paper: How
  • [54] Collaborative Creativity is Shaped by Different Semiotic Resources. International Journal of
  • [55] Education & the Arts, v. 20 n 20. p.1-26.
  • [56] Seels, B.A. (1994). Visual literacy: The definition problem. D.M. Moore ve F.M. Dwyer, (Eds.).
  • [57] Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning. (pp. 97-112). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
  • [58] Educational Technology Publications.
  • [59] Sibbet, D. (2001). A graphic facilitation retrospective. Adapted from a paper presented at the
  • [60] International Association of Facilitators: The Art and Mastery of Facilitation – Navigating the
  • [61] Future IAF Conference, 2001, May 16–20. Minnesota. DOI: https://doi.
  • [62] org/10.1080/00405840801992306
  • [63] Sibbet, D. (2013). Reuniões Visuais. Rio de Janeiro: Atlas Books.
  • [64] Smith, G. M. (1985). The Collaborative Drawing Technique. Journal of Personality Assessment,
  • [65] [s. l.], v. 49, n. 6, p. 582.
  • [66] Snir S., & Wiseman, H.(2010). Attachment in Romantic Couples and Perceptions of a Joint
  • [67] Drawing Session. The Family Journal. 18(2):116-126. doi:10.1177/1066480710364318"
  • [68]
Como citar:

Bertoso, Luciana da Silva ; Moraes, Reinaldo Pereira de ; Padovani, Stephania ; "Dinâmicas colaborativas de discussão visual: um mapeamento sistemático", p-64-79. In: Anais do 10º CIDI | Congresso Internacional de Design da Informação, edição 2021 e do 10º CONGIC | Congresso Nacional de Iniciação Científica em Design da Informação. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/cidicongic2021-006-355052-CIDI-Comunicacao_a.pdf

últimos 30 dias

230
downloads

339
visualizações

1159
indexações