Full Paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

In search of Inclusive Participatory City-Making

In search of Inclusive Participatory City-Making

López Reyes, María Elena ; Mulder,  Ingrid ;

Full Paper:

Participatory methods have been widely explored in the public sector to democratize city-making projects and foster civic engagement. Although well-intentioned, participatory processes still too often exclude citizens. The current study looks for elements enabling city makers to articulate an inclusive Participatory City Making process. Starting from a review of participatory methods, we distilled the conditions necessary to consider a participatory process inclusive. In order to understand inclusiveness in practice, we performed interviews with a diverse group of city makers in an ongoing local participation process. The result is a framework that offers eight moments of reflection for public sector city makers to articulate more inclusive Participatory City-Making processes.

Full Paper:

Participatory methods have been widely explored in the public sector to democratize city-making projects and foster civic engagement. Although well-intentioned, participatory processes still too often exclude citizens. The current study looks for elements enabling city makers to articulate an inclusive Participatory City Making process. Starting from a review of participatory methods, we distilled the conditions necessary to consider a participatory process inclusive. In order to understand inclusiveness in practice, we performed interviews with a diverse group of city makers in an ongoing local participation process. The result is a framework that offers eight moments of reflection for public sector city makers to articulate more inclusive Participatory City-Making processes.

Palavras-chave: Citizen Engagement, Inclusiveness, Participation, Reflection,

Palavras-chave: Citizen Engagement, Inclusiveness, Participation, Reflection,

DOI: 10.5151/ead2021-142

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "Bannon, J. L., & Ehn, P. (2012). Design Matters in Participatory Design. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (1st ed., pp. 37–63). London: Taylor & Francis.
  • [2] Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801
  • [3] Blomkamp, E. (2018). The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(4), 729–74
  • [4] Bødker, S., & Iversen, O. S. (2002). Staging a professional participatory design practice - Moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In O.W. Bertelsen, S. Bødker, & K. Kuutti (Eds.), Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (NordiCHI '02), (pp. 11-18). New York: ACM.
  • [5] Burgess, M. M. (2014). From “trust us” to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 48–52.
  • [6] Bustamante Duarte, A. M., Ataei, M., Degbelo, A., Brendel, N., & Kray, C. (2019). Safe spaces in participatory design with young forced migrants. CoDesign, 17(2), 1–23.
  • [7] Bustamante Duarte, A. M., Brendel, N., Degbelo, A., & Kray, C. (2018). Participatory design and participatory research: An HCI case study with young forced migrants. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(1), 1–39.
  • [8] Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 325–350.
  • [9] Concilio, G., Cullen, J., & Tosoni, I. (2019). Design Enabled Innovation in Urban Environments (Chapter 5). In G. Concilio and I. Tosoni (Eds.), Innovation Capacity and the City, the enabling role of design (pp. 85-100). Cham: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology.
  • [10] Cook, T. (2012). Where Participatory Approaches Meet Pragmatism in Funded (Health) Research: The Challenge of Finding Meaningful Spaces. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/17169/fqs-13.1.1783
  • [11] Darrell, L., Littlefield, M., & Washington, E. M. (2016). Safe Spaces, Nurturing Places. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(1), 43–49.
  • [12] De Koning, J. I. J. C., Puerari, E., Mulder, I. J., & Loorbach, D. A. (2018). Design-Enabled Participatory City Making. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2018, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436356
  • [13] De Koning, J. I. J. C., Puerari, E., Mulder, I. J., & Loorbach, D. A. (2017). Ten types of emerging city makers. Proceedings of RSD6 Relating Systems Thinking and Design 2017, 1–11.
  • [14] DiSalvo, C., & Le Dantec, C. A. (2017). Civic Design. Interactions, 24(6), 5-88.
  • [15] Diver, S. W., & Higgins, M. N. (2014). Giving back through collaborative research: Towards a practice of dynamic reciprocity. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2), 1-13.
  • [16] Dreessen, K., Hendriks, N., Schepers, S., & Wilkinson, A. (2020). Towards reciprocity in Participatory Design processes. In C. Del Gaudio, L. Parra, S. Agid, C. Parra, G. Poderi, D. Duque, L. Villezcas, A. Botero, F.C. Londoño, & P. Escandón (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise, Vol. 2 (pp. 154–158). New York: ACM.
  • [17] Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991) Preface. In O. Fals-Borda, & M. A. Rahman (Eds.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research (pp. vii-viii). New York: Doubleday.
  • [18] Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., & Iversen, O. S. (2015). In pursuit of rigor and accountability in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 93–106.
  • [19] Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A., (2008). Power and Knowledge. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research (pp.172-189). Sage Publications: London.
  • [20] Gemeente Delft (n.d.). Delfts Doen | Gemeente Delft. Retrieved April 23, 2020, from https://www.delft.nl/bestuur-en-organisatie/delft-2040/omgevingsvisie/omgevingswet/delfts-doen
  • [21] Gergen, K. J. (1985). The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.
  • [22] Götsch, M., Klinger, S., & Thiesen, A. (2012). “Stars in der Manege?” Democracy Theory and its Implications for Participatory Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1780
  • [23] Hansen, N. B., Dindler, C., Halskov, K., Iversen, O. S., Bossen, C., Basballe, D. A., & Schouten, B. (2019). How participatory design works: Mechanisms and effects. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction (pp. 30-41). New York: ACM.
  • [24] Hussain, S. (2010). Empowering marginalised children in developing countries through participatory design processes. CoDesign, 6(2), 99–117.
  • [25] Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), 419–436.
  • [26] Kozak, L. E., Falk, C. A., & Chisholm, C. J. (2020). Sticks, Ropes, Land: Confronting Colonial Practices in Public Space Design. In C. Del Gaudio, L. Parra, S. Agid, C. Parra, G. Poderi, D. Duque, L. Villezcas, A. Botero, F.C. Londoño, & P. Escandón (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise, Vol. 2 (pp. 63–67). New York: ACM.
  • [27] Larkin, M., & Thompson, A. R. (2012). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in Mental Health and Psychotherapy Research. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy: A Guide for Students and Practitioners (First Edit, pp. 101–116). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249.ch8
  • [28] Lopera-Molano, D., & Lopera-Molano, A. M. (2020). Designing communities in peace: Participatory action-research approaches embedded in regional education in Colombia. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 13(1), 1–16.
  • [29] Marshall, J., & Reason, P. (2007). Quality in research as “taking an attitude of inquiry.” Management Research News, 30(5), 368–380.
  • [30] Nascimento, S. (2014). Critical Notions of Technology and the Promises of Empowerment in Shared Machine Shops. Journal of Peer Production, 5, 1–4.
  • [31] Rath, J. (2012). Poetry and Participation: Scripting a Meaningful Research Text with Rape Crisis Workers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1791
  • [32] Robertson, T., & Simonsen, J. (2012). Participatory Design an Introduction. In J. Simonsen, & T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (1st ed., pp. 1–18). London: Taylor & Francis.
  • [33] Russo, J. (2012). Survivor-Controlled Research: A New Foundation for Thinking about Psychiatry and Mental Health. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1790
  • [34] Shah, A., Goncalves, M., & Mulder, I. (2020). Design research for participatory policies: Paradoxes, Themes, Futures. In C. Del Gaudio, L. Parra, S. Agid, C. Parra, G. Poderi, D. Duque, L. Villezcas, A. Botero, F.C. Londoño, & P. Escandón (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise, Vol. 2 (pp. 82–86). New York: ACM.
  • [35] Scheuerman, M. K., Branham, S. M., & Hamidi, F. (2018). Safe spaces and safe places: Unpacking technology-mediated experiences of safety and harm with transgender people. In K. Karahakios, A. Monroy-Hernández, A. Lampinen, & G. Fitzpatrick (Eds), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2 (pp. 1-34). New York: ACM.
  • [36] Slingerland, G., Lukosch, S., Hengst, M. den, Nevejan, C., & Brazier, F. (2020). Together We Can Make It Work! Toward a Design Framework for Inclusive and Participatory City-Making of Playable Cities. Frontiers in Computer Science, 2(October). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.600654
  • [37] Slingerland, G., Mulder, I., & Jaśkiewicz, T. (2019). Join the Park! Exploring Opportunities to Lower the Participation Divide in Park Communities. In F. Cech, & H. Tellioglu (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities Technologies (pp. 131-135). New York: ACM.
  • [38] Somekh, B. (1994). Inhabiting Each Other’s Castles: Towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration. Educational Action Research, 2(3), 357–381.
  • [39] Stren, R. (2001, November). Thinking about Urban Inclusiveness. Centre for Urban and Community Studies Research Bulletin, 4, 1–6.
  • [40] Stuedahl, D. (2002). The performativity of Design - participatory design of new practices. In T. Binder, J. Gregory & I. Wagner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Participatory Design Conference 2002 (pp. 254-259). Palo Alto: CPSR.
  • [41] Teal, G., & French, T. (2020). Spaces for participatory design innovation. In C. Del Gaudio, L. Parra, S. Agid, C. Parra, G. Poderi, D. Duque, L. Villezcas, A. Botero, F.C. Londoño, & P. Escandón (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise, Vol. 2 (pp. 64–74). New York: ACM.
  • [42] Turner, J. R., Baker, R., & Kellner, F. (2018). Theoretical Literature Review: Tracing the Life Cycle of a Theory and Its Verified and Falsified Statements. Human Resource Development Review, 17(1), 34–61.
  • [43] Uitermark, J., Nicholls, W., & Loopmans, M. (2012). Cities and social movements: Theorizing beyond the right to the city. Environment and Planning A, 44(11), 2546–2554. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44301
  • [44] von Unger, H. (2012). Participatory Health Research: Who Participates in What? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1781
Como citar:

López Reyes, María Elena; Mulder,  Ingrid; "In search of Inclusive Participatory City-Making", p. 475-485 . In: 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ead2021-142

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações