¡Liberen a los estudiantes de su disciplina! La formación de los arquitectos en la era 2.0

¡Liberen a los estudiantes de su disciplina! La formación de los arquitectos en la era 2.0

Moreira, Alejandro Ariel; Parera, Cecilia

Article:

In the context of recent transformations in the professional practice of architecture after the incorporation of new developments in digital technology, the rigid disciplinary and scope of intervention delimitations that characterize most academic proposals have lost support. This paper intends to contribute, in general, to the consideration about the referred problem, and, in particular, to the discussion about the urge to review the curricula of the architectural programs of most Latin-American universities, still defined by the concept of an autonomous and individual architect.

In the context of recent transformations in the professional practice of architecture after the incorporation of new developments in digital technology, the rigid disciplinary and scope of intervention delimitations that characterize most academic proposals have lost support. This paper intends to contribute, in general, to the consideration about the referred problem, and, in particular, to the discussion about the urge to review the curricula of the architectural programs of most Latin-American universities, still defined by the concept of an autonomous and individual architect.

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/despro-sigradi2014-0034

Referências bibliográficas

• [1] Carpo, M. (2009). Revolución 2.0. El fin de la autoría humanista. En Revista Arquitectura Viva, n° 124 (pp. 19-25). España.
• [2] Cheng, R. (2006). Questioning the role of BIM in architectural education. En AECbytes Viewpoint, n° 26, julio (pp. 1-5).
• [3] Cory, C. (2012) Applying BIM in design curriculum. En N. Gu Andamp; X. Wang. Computational design methods and technologies. Applications in CAD, CAM and CAE education. Hershey, PA: IGI global.
• [4] Deamer, P. (2011). BIM in Academia. En Deamer, P. Andamp; Bernstein, P. BIM in Academia (pp. 1-4). New Haven: Yale School of Architecture.
• [5] Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ´design thinking´ and its application. En Design Studies, volume 32, issue 7, November (pp. 521-532) Durbrow, J.Andamp; Robertson, D. (2011). Master of integrated building delivery: providing comprehensive delivery strategies to promote a quality built environment. En Deamer, P. Andamp; Bernstein, P. BIM in Academia (pp. 100-106). New Haven: Yale School of Architecture. SIGRADI 2014
• [6] Johnson, R. (2014) Building information modeling in construction education. En American Council for Construction Educa- tion Presentation. Tampa: Fl. Disponible en http://www.acce-hq.org/images/uploads/Reid_Johnson_ACCE_Presen- tation-2014_Tampa.pdf
• [7] Holland, R., Wing, S. Andamp; Goldberg, D. (2013). Interdisciplinary Collaborative BIM Studio. En BIM Academic Education Sympo- sium. National Institute of Building Sciences. Washington D.C.
• [8] Martin-Iglesias, R. (2011). Hacia un nuevo paradigma de diseño colaborativo. En XV Congreso SIGRADI, FADU UNL, Santa Fe, Argentina (pp. 122-125).
• [9] Mayne, T. (2005). Change or perish. En American Institute of Architects National Convention, Las Vegas, EE.UU: AIA.
• [10] Moreira, A. (2012). Integración y colaboración tecnológica en arquitectura. En XVI Congreso SIGRADI, Fortaleza, Brasil (pp. 268-271).
• [11] Sanguinetti, P. (2009). BIM in academia: Shifting our attention from product to process. En Tidafi and T. Dorta (eds) Joining Languages, Cultures and Visions: CAADFutures (pp. 395-409).
• [12] Whiting, S. (2003). Going Public. En Hunch n° 6/7, Berlage Institute Report (pp. 497-502).

Como citar:

Moreira, Alejandro Ariel; Parera, Cecilia; "¡Liberen a los estudiantes de su disciplina! La formación de los arquitectos en la era 2.0", p-187-190. In: Proceedings of the XVIII Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics: Design in Freedom [=Blucher Design Proceedings, v.1, n.8]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2014.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/despro-sigradi2014-0034