Outubro 2023 vol. 10 num. 5 - IX Simpósio Internacional de Inovação e Tecnologia

Full article - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

LOW CARBON ECONOMY AND THE SUGAR AND ALCOHOL INDUSTRY: AN APPROACH TO ESG MANAGEMENT

LOW CARBON ECONOMY AND THE SUGAR AND ALCOHOL INDUSTRY: AN APPROACH TO ESG MANAGEMENT

Teixeira, Layla Leão Lima ; Murari, Thiago Barros ; Nascimento Filho, Aloísio S. ; Borges, Toni Alex Reis ; Saba, Hugo ;

Full article:

Ethanol production can generate both positive and negative externalities, all related to ESG (environmental, social and governance) principles. Thus, a study of the positive and negative externalities of ethanol production was conducted through a critical analysis of the literature and construction of a conceptual framework. The results highlighted that ethanol production has positive externalities (renewable source, reduction of emissions and sustainability) and negative externalities (soil degradation, pollution, use of pesticides). However, management that ensures an adequate balance between these externalities can provide social, environmental and governance benefits for the entire organization.

Full article:

Ethanol production can generate both positive and negative externalities, all related to ESG (environmental, social and governance) principles. Thus, a study of the positive and negative externalities of ethanol production was conducted through a critical analysis of the literature and construction of a conceptual framework. The results highlighted that ethanol production has positive externalities (renewable source, reduction of emissions and sustainability) and negative externalities (soil degradation, pollution, use of pesticides). However, management that ensures an adequate balance between these externalities can provide social, environmental and governance benefits for the entire organization.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Industry; Ethanol; Environmental; Social; Governance,

Palavras-chave: Industry; Ethanol; Environmental; Social; Governance,

DOI: 10.5151/siintec2023-305645

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "(1) Neves, MF; Martinez, LF The GAS-Agro Model for Sustainable Development Projects . Rev. Agron . Bras. 2020 , 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.29372/rab202032.
  • [2] (2) Meira, E.; Cunha, FAF de S.; Orsato, RJ; Miralles - Quirós, MM; Miralles ‐ Quirós, JL Added Value and Differentiation between ESG Investment Strategies in Stock Exchanges. Bus. Strategic Environment. 2022 , bse.3221. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3221.
  • [3] (3) Sierdovski, M.; Pilatti, LA; Rubbo , P. Organizational Skills in the Development of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Criteria in the Industrial Sector. Sustainability 2022 , 14 (20), 1346 https://doi.org/10.3390/su14201 346
  • [4] (4) Araghi, MK; Barkhordari, S.; Hassannia, R. Economic Impacts of Bioethanol Production in Iran: A CGE Approach. Energy 2023 , 263 , 125765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125765.
  • [5] (5) SOUZA, P. AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON THE CREDIT RISK OF COUNTRIES, 2018.
  • [6] (6) Caldas, MV de A.; Veiga-Neto, AR; Guimarães , LG de A.; Castro, ABC of; Pereira, GRB Greenwashing in Environmental Marketing Strategy in the Brazilian Furniture Market. Rev. economy And Social. Rural 2021 , 59 (3), e22533 https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.22533
  • [7] (7) Stefanoni, S.; Voltes-Dorta , A. Technical Efficiency of Automobile Manufacturers Under Environmental and Sustainability Pressures: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. J. Clean. Product 2021 , 311 , 127589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127589.
  • [8] (8) BNDES. BNDES Finem - Environment . https://www.bndes.gov.br/wps/portal/site/home/financiamento/produto/bndes-finem-meio-ambiente (accessed on 03-21-2023).
  • [9] (9) FUNDEP. Route 2030 - V Line - Biofuels, Safety and Vehicle Propulsion. https://rota2030.fundep.ufmg.br/linha5/ (accessed on 21-03-2023).
  • [10] (10) RBC Global Asset Management. Global Sustainable Investing Review 2020. ; 2020. https://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GSIR-20201.pdf (accessed 2023-03-21).
  • [11] (11) MME. Federal Governor. RenovaBio program. ; 2017. http://legislacao.planalto.gov.br/legisla/legislacao.nsf/Viw_Identificacao/lei%2013.576-2017?OpenDocument (accessed on 2023-03-05).
  • [12] (12) Suttipun, M.; Yordudom , T. Impact of environmental, social and governance disclosures on market reaction: evidence from Thailand's top 50 listed companies. J. Finance. Report. Account. 2022 , 20 (3/4), 753–767. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2020-0377.
  • [13] (13) Bikomeye, JC; Rublee, CS; Beyer, KMM Positive Externalities of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation for Human Health: A Review and Conceptual Framework for Public Health Research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021 , 18 (5), 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052481.
  • [14] (14) GIL, AC How to Prepare Research Projects . , 6a .; Atlas: Sao Paulo, 2018.
  • [15] (15) Betim , LM Model for Assessing the Forces of Externalities in Clustered Interorganizational Networks (RIA). Doctoral Thesis ., Ponta Grossa /PR., 2019.
  • [16] (16) Mauri, M., Elli, T., Caviglia, G., Uboldi, G., & Azzi, M. RAWGraphs: A Visualization Platform for Creating Open Outputs. 12:00 _ Biennial conference on the 2017 SIGCHI Italian Chapter. https://www.rawgraphs.io/.
  • [17] (17) Kim, H., Lee, H., & Kim, S. Lifecycle Greenhouse gas emissions from bioethanol and gasoline from sugarcane and corn in Brazil and the United States. 50th edition Environmental Science and Technology 2016, pp 12561–12571.
  • [18] (18) UNEM. Corn ethanol production grows 800% in five years and attracts companies. https://www.novacana.com/noticias/producao-etanol-milho-cresce-800-cinco-anos-atrai-empresas-270123 (accessed on 2023-03-21).
  • [19] (19) César Cunha Campos, R.; Richard Simonsen; Sydney González. Agribusiness . 2019 , 234.
  • [20] (20) Fernandes, FC, de Assis, AC, de Souza, GF, & de Andrade, JA Environmental Impacts of Sugarcane Bioethanol Production in Brazil: A Review. Renewable and sustainable energy assessments. 2017, pages 994–1003.
  • [21] (21) Chavez-Rodriguez, MF; Mosqueira -Salazar, KJ; Teach, AV; Nebra , SA Reuse and Recycling of Water according to the Quality of Streams in Sugar and Alcohol Plants. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2013 , 17 (5), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2013.08.003.
  • [22] (22) Production and Use of Ethanol in Brazil. ; International Renewable Energy Agency - IRENA., 2017. https://www.irena.org/publications/2017/Mar/Ethanol-Production-and-Use-in-Brazil.
  • [23] (23) Bordonal, R. de O.; Carvalho, JLN; Lal, R.; from Figueiredo, EB; de Oliveira, BG; La Scala, N. Sustainability of sugarcane production in Brazil. A review. Agron . To sustain. Dev. 2018 , 38 (2), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0490-x.
  • [24] (24) Cardoso, TF; Watanabe, MDB; Souza, A.; Chagas, MF; Paulo, S.; Cavalett, O.; Morales, ER; Paulo, S.; Nogueira, LAH Psychological, environmental and social impacts of different sugarcane production systems. 2017 , 15.
  • [25] (25) Costa, AO da; Galdeman, DA; Alekseev, KCPG Impact on Human Health by the Use of Biofuels in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo. ; 2021. https://www.epe.gov.br/sites-pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/PublicacoesArquivos/publicacao-570/NT-EPE-DPG-SDB-2020-01_NT_Impacto_saude_uso_bios.pdf (accessed on 2023-03-21).
  • [26] (26) Martins, HH; Shikida, PFA; Sesso Filho, UA; Gimenes, RMT; Calvo, JCA Production Generation, Employment and Wages in the Sugar and Alcohol Industries In 2000 and 2009. CHALLENGES Rev. Interdisciplinary Federal University. Tocantins 2016 , 2 (2), 198. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2359-3652.2016v2n2p198.
  • [27] (27) Ribeiro, CH; Cunha, MP The Economic and Environmental Impacts of the National Biofuels Policy. Biofuels Bioprod . biorefining 2022 , 16 (2), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2326.
  • [28] (28) Moraes, MAFD de; Bacchi, MRP; Caldarelli , CE Accelerated Growth of the Sugarcane, Sugar and Alcohol Sectors in Brazil (2000-2008): Effects on Gross Domestic Product Per Capita Municipality in the Center-South Region. Biomass Bioenergy 2016 , 91 , 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.004.
  • [29] (29) Costa, CC; Guilhoto , J. Social Impacts of Increased Demand for Hydrated Ethanol versus Type C Gasoline on the Brazilian Economy . Northeast Economic magazine (REN) . 2014, p. 20.
  • [30] (30) Cruz, MG; Warrior, E.; Raiher , AP The Evolution of Ethanol Production in Brazil , From 1975 to 2009 ; Technical Report 43; 2012; pages 142–159.
  • [31] (31) Zhang, H.; Chen, W. The Role of Biofuels in China's Transport Sector in Carbon Mitigation Scenarios. Energy Proceeded 2015 , 75 , 2700–2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.682.
  • [32] (32) Khalil, MA; Nimmanunta , K. Conventional versus Green Investing: Advancing Innovation for Better Financial and Environmental Prospects. J. Sustain. Finance Invest. 2021 , 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822.
  • [33] (33) Giwa, T.; Akbari, M.; Kumar, A. Technoeconomic Evaluation of an Integrated Biorefinery Producing Bio-Oil, Ethanol and Hydrogen. Fuel 2023 , 332 , 126022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126022.
  • [34] "
Como citar:

Teixeira, Layla Leão Lima ; Murari, Thiago Barros ; Nascimento Filho, Aloísio S. ; Borges, Toni Alex Reis ; Saba, Hugo ; "LOW CARBON ECONOMY AND THE SUGAR AND ALCOHOL INDUSTRY: AN APPROACH TO ESG MANAGEMENT", p. 108-115 . In: . São Paulo: Blucher, 2023.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/siintec2023-305645

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações