Dezembro 2021 vol. 9 num. 5 - 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research

Full Paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Mapping unchartered waters: Towards a Design methodology for researching the feasibility of circular economy practice adoption in the Ready-To-Cook fish product value chain.

Mapping unchartered waters: Towards a Design methodology for researching the feasibility of circular economy practice adoption in the Ready-To-Cook fish product value chain.

Alter, Hayley ; Tsekleves, Emmanuel ; Hands, David ;

Full Paper:

For stakeholders across the Ready-to-cook fish product value chain to adopt novel circular economy methods, new shared knowledge infrastructures must support changes in practices. Existing literature indicates that these cannot be imposed in a generalised manner. As an alternative, we propose that Participatory Design-informed infrastructuring could provide a means of developing them with stakeholders through exploring existing practices and feasibility for adopting prototypical methods, practices and products. Using the Seafood AGE consortia as a case study, we have developed two facilitative methods using accessible digital platforms in a remote and distributed manner, for collaborating with stakeholders to map and analyse practices and responses to speculative products. This paper reports on method development. It has implications for design research academics interfacing across industries to support transition to circular economies.

Full Paper:

For stakeholders across the Ready-to-cook fish product value chain to adopt novel circular economy methods, new shared knowledge infrastructures must support changes in practices. Existing literature indicates that these cannot be imposed in a generalised manner. As an alternative, we propose that Participatory Design-informed infrastructuring could provide a means of developing them with stakeholders through exploring existing practices and feasibility for adopting prototypical methods, practices and products. Using the Seafood AGE consortia as a case study, we have developed two facilitative methods using accessible digital platforms in a remote and distributed manner, for collaborating with stakeholders to map and analyse practices and responses to speculative products. This paper reports on method development. It has implications for design research academics interfacing across industries to support transition to circular economies.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Seafood, Circular Economy, Infrastructuring, Research Methods,

Palavras-chave: Seafood, Circular Economy, Infrastructuring, Research Methods,

DOI: 10.5151/ead2021-193

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "Arts, J. W., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 134–144.
  • [2] Bennett, S (2020). Seeing it, feeling it, video-conferencing it: what policy can learn from participatory art and design in a time of social distancing . Available at https://openpolicy.blog.gov.uk/author/stephen-bennett/ (Accessed: 14 June 2021).
  • [3] Berger, S., Bärtsch, C., Schmidt, C., Christandl, F. and Wyss, A.M., 2018. When utilitarian claims backfire: advertising content and the uptake of insects as food. Frontiers in nutrition, 5, p.88.
  • [4] Beveridge, M.C., Thilsted, S.H., Phillips, M.J., Metian, M., Troell, M. and Hall, S.J., 2013. Meeting the food and nutrition needs of the poor: the role of fish and the opportunities and challenges emerging from the rise of aquaculturea.
  • [5] Bush, S.R. and Duijf, M., 2011. Searching for (un) sustainabilty in pangasius aquaculture: A political economy of quality in European retail. Geoforum, 42(2), pp.185-196.
  • [6] Cabinet Papers. (Unknown) The Cod Wars. Available at: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm (Accessed: 14 June 2021).
  • [7] Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C. and Pettersen, I.N., 2018. Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), p.2758.
  • [8] Chamberlin, L., & Boks, C. (2018). Marketing approaches for a circular economy: Using design frameworks to interpret online communications. Sustainability, 10(6), 2070.
  • [9] Dantec CAL, DiSalvo C. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science. 2013;43(2):241-264.
  • [10] de la Caba, K., Guerrero, P., Trung, T.S., Cruz-Romero, M., Kerry, J.P., Fluhr, J., Maurer, M., Kruijssen, F., Albalat, A., Bunting, S. and Burt, S., 2019. From seafood waste to active seafood packaging: An emerging opportunity of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, pp.86-98.
  • [11] Ehn, P. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2008, Bloomington, IN, USA, 30 September–4 October 2008; ACM: New York, NY, USA.
  • [12] FAO, 2009. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Factors of Unsustainability and Overexploitation in Marine Fisheries. Views from the Southern Mediterranean, West Africa, Southeast Asia and the Caribbean. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1037. Rome.
  • [13] FAO, 2016. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Contributing to Food Security and Nutrition for All. Rome.
  • [14] Fraser, E., Legwegoh, A., Krishna, K.C., CoDyre, M., Dias, G., Hazen, S., Johnson, R., Martin, R., Ohberg, L., Sethuratnam, S., Sneyd, L., Smithers, J., Van Acker, R., Vansteenkiste, J., Wittman, H., Yada, R., 2016. Biotechnology or organic?Extensive or intensive? Global or local? A critical review of potential pathways to resolve the global food crisis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 48, 78e87.
  • [15] Fletcher, C.A., St Clair, R. and Sharmina, M., 2021. Seafood businesses’ resilience can benefit from circular economy principles. Nature Food, 2(4), pp.228-232.
  • [16] Galabo, R., Cruickshank, L., and Peréz, D., (2020). DisCO: A distributed co-design approach. Available at http://imagination.lancaster.ac.uk/update/disco-a-distributed-co-design-approach/ (Accessed: 14 June 2021)
  • [17] Guillard, V., Gaucel, S., Fornaciari, C., Angellier-Coussy, H., Buche, P. and Gontard, N., 2018. The next generation of sustainable food packaging to preserve our environment in a circular economy context. Frontiers in nutrition, 5, p.121.
  • [18] Haldén, C., Lidfeldt, M., Haxhijaj, D., Björkner, M., Jiresten, E. and Johansson, S., 2019. New products from seafood side streams to stimulate a circular economy.
  • [19] Harte M, Tiller R, Kailis G, Burden M: Countering a climate of instability: the future of relative stability under the Common Fisheries Policy. ICES J Mar Sci 20
  • [20] Heron, J. and Reason, P., 2008. Extending epistemology within a co-operative inquiry. The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, pp.366-380.
  • [21] Herrero, M., Thornton, P.K., Mason-D’Croz, D., Palmer, J., Benton, T.G., Bodirsky, B.L., Bogard, J.R., Hall, A., Lee, B., Nyborg, K. and Pradhan, P., 2020. Innovation can accelerate the transition towards a sustainable food system. Nature Food, 1(5), pp.266-272.
  • [22] Irani, Z. and Sharif, A.M., 2018. Food security across the enterprise: a puzzle, problem or mess for a circular economy?. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
  • [23] Jaeger, B. and Upadhyay, A., 2020. Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
  • [24] Jones, P., Comfort, D. and Hillier, D. (2011) ‘Sustainability in the European Shop Window’,European Retail Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1-19
  • [25] Jones, P. and Comfort, D., 2018. The Circular Economy and the Leading European Retailers: A Research Note. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(2), pp.1-8.
  • [26] Kaiser, M (2016). Brexit, Fisheries, and Forgotten History . Available at https://sustainablefisheries-uw.org/brexit-fisheries-and-forgotten-history/ (Accessed: 14 June 2021).
  • [27] Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A. and Hekkert, M., 2018. Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, pp.264-272.
  • [28] Laso, J., García-Herrero, I., Margallo, M., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Fullana, P., Bala, A., Gazulla, C., Irabien, Á. and Aldaco, R., 2018. Finding an economic and environmental balance in value chains based on circular economy thinking: An eco-efficiency methodology applied to the fish canning industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, pp.428-437.
  • [29] Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., & Bieberstein, A. (2014). Consumer acceptance of controversial new food technologies: Causes and roots of controversies. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6, 381–405.
  • [30] McCarthy, B., Kapetanaki, A.B. and Wang, P., 2019. Circular agri-food approaches: will consumers buy novel products made from vegetable waste?. Rural Society, 28(2), pp.91-107.
  • [31] Nyborg, K., Anderies, J.M., Dannenberg, A., Lindahl, T., Schill, C., Schlüter, M., Adger, W.N., Arrow, K.J., Barrett, S., Carpenter, S. and Chapin, F.S., 2016. Social norms as solutions. Science, 354(6308), pp.42-43.
  • [32] Patterson, M. and Glavovic, B., 2013. From frontier economics to an ecological economics of the oceans and coasts. Sustainability science, 8(1), pp.11-24.
  • [33] Pauli, G.A., 2010. The blue economy: 10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs. Paradigm publications.
  • [34] Ruiz-Salmón, I., Margallo, M., Laso, J., Villanueva-Rey, P., Mariño, D., Quinteiro, P., Dias, A.C., Nunes, M.L., Marques, A., Feijoo, G. and Moreira, M.T., 2020. Addressing challenges and opportunities of the European seafood sector under a circular economy framework. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 13, pp.101-106.
  • [35] Schöggl, J.P., Stumpf, L. and Baumgartner, R.J., 2020. The narrative of sustainability and circular economy-A longitudinal review of two decades of research. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, p.105073.
  • [36] Shove, E., Watson, M. and Spurling, N., 2015. Conceptualizing connections: Energy demand, infrastructures and social practices. European journal of social theory, 18(3), pp.274-287.
  • [37] Silver, J.J., Gray, N.J., Campbell, L.M., Fairbanks, L.W. and Gruby, R.L., 2015. Blue economy and competing discourses in international oceans governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 24(2), pp.135-160.
  • [38] Skene, K.R., 2018. Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work. Sustainability Science, 13(2), pp.479-492.
  • [39] Tlusty, M.F. and Thorsen, Ø., 2017. Claiming seafood is ‘sustainable’risks limiting improvements. Fish and Fisheries, 18(2), pp.340-346.
  • [40] Wareing, L (2020). Taking workshops for design research online. Available at https://transformationnorthwest.org/taking-workshops-for-design-research-online/ (Accessed: 8 Feb 2021)
  • [41] Watson, M., & Meah, A. (2012). Food, waste and safety: Negotiating conflicting social anxieties into the practices of domestic provisioning. The Sociological Review, 60(S2), 102–120.
Como citar:

Alter, Hayley; Tsekleves, Emmanuel; Hands, David; "Mapping unchartered waters: Towards a Design methodology for researching the feasibility of circular economy practice adoption in the Ready-To-Cook fish product value chain.", p. 373-393 . In: 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ead2021-193

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações