Dezembro 2020 vol. 8 num. 4 - XXIV International Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics

Conference full papers - Open Access.

Idioma principal

Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle (MMSEV) Nosecone Design Optimization

Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle (MMSEV) Nosecone Design Optimization

Bhattacharya, Maharshi ; Jung, Francisco ;

Conference full papers:

This paper addresses ergonomic drawbacks in NASA’s modular Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle’s (MMSEV) latest prototype, 2B’s nosecone, to propose new iteration based on considerations such as mass minimization, visibility maximization, and structural integrity. With 2B as a benchmark, and using computational tools typically used in the AEC industry to carry out FEA analysis, comparisons are made with potential design changes. The numerical and visual data such as weight, and stress distribution, provided by the benchmark analysis, served as metrics for comparison and redesign. In turn, this design development exercise attempts to bring together the different design approaches to design, held by human- factors designers and structural engineers.

Conference full papers:

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Form, Optimization, Finite Element Analysis, Space-Exploration Vehicle, Stress-Analysis,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/sigradi2020-36

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Abercromby, A., Gernhardt, M., & Jadwick, J. (2013). Evaluation of dual multi-mission space exploration vehicle operations during simulated planetary surface exploration. Acta Astronautica, 90, 203-214.doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.022
  • [2] Abercromby, A., Gernhardt, M., Litaker, H. (2010). Desert Research and Technology Studies (DRATS) 2008, Evaluation of Small Pressurized Rover and Unpressurized Rover Prototype Vehicles in a Lunar Analog Environment
  • [3] Bobskill, M., R., Lupisella, M., L., Mueller, R., P., Sibille, L., Vangen, S., Williams-Byrd, J. (2015). Preparing for Mars: Evolvable Mars Campaign: Proving Ground approach, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2015
  • [4] Drake, B., G. (Editor) (2009). Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 NASA SP-2009-566-ADD, 2009
  • [5] Howard, R. (2014). An Alternate Configuration of the Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle. NASA. Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/201400 04223.pdf
  • [6] Howe, A., Simon. M., Smitherman, D., Howard, R., Toups, L., Hoffman, S. (2015). NASA Evolvable Mars Campaign: Mars Surface Habitability Options. IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 7-14 Mar 2015
  • [7] Litaker, H., Thompson, S., & Howard, R. (2009). A Comparison of the Unpressurized Rover and Small Pressurized Rover during a Desert Field Evaluation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
  • [8] Litker, H., Thompson, S., & Howard, R. (2010). Human Habitation in a Lunar Electric Rover during a 14-Day Field Trial. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • [9] Litaker, H., Thompson, S., Szabo, R., Twyford, E., Conlee, C., & Howard, R. Dual rover human habitation field study. Acta Astronautica, 90(2), 378-390. ISSN 0094-5765
  • [10] NASA. (1971). Apollo 15 Mission Report. Manned Spacecraft Center, 8-2, 9-8, 14-6. MSC-05161
  • [11] NASA. (1972). Apollo 16 Mission Report. Manned Spacecraft Center, 8-1, 9-19, 14-115. MSC 07230.
  • [12] NASA. (1973). Apollo 17 Mission Report. Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 9-1, 10-12, 15-25. JSC 07904.
Como citar:

Bhattacharya, Maharshi; Jung, Francisco; "Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle (MMSEV) Nosecone Design Optimization", p. 260-266 . In: Congreso SIGraDi 2020. São Paulo: Blucher, 2020.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/sigradi2020-36

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações