Outubro 2023 vol. 11 num. 4 - 15th International Conference of the European Academy of Design

Full paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Participatory Design and Democracy: A systematic review

Participatory Design and Democracy: A systematic review

Freire, Lara Liz ; Souto, Virgínia Tiradentes ; Silva, Tiago Barros Pontes e ; Siqueira, Nayara Moreno de ;

Full paper:

Recently, the role of Design in relation to Democracy has been discussed in literature, and Participatory Design has proven to be a very adherent term to this relationship. The aim of this work is to discuss Participatory Design as an instrument for the elaboration of transformative remedies, contributing to the maximization of rationality and effectiveness in the design of public policies. For this, the Meta-Analytic Focus Theory was used to analyse the most relevant elements, such as publications, authors, and keywords from literature. The data collection included articles published between 2012 and 2022 and the Bibliometrix and Tagcloud software were used for the investigation. The findings identified that Computer Science and Social Sciences stand out and are the most representative areas, politics, computation, community, innovation, and governance are the most relevant topics related to the subject, and decolonial agenda and contemporary feminist utopia have an important correlation also.

Full paper:

Recently, the role of Design in relation to Democracy has been discussed in literature, and Participatory Design has proven to be a very adherent term to this relationship. The aim of this work is to discuss Participatory Design as an instrument for the elaboration of transformative remedies, contributing to the maximization of rationality and effectiveness in the design of public policies. For this, the Meta-Analytic Focus Theory was used to analyse the most relevant elements, such as publications, authors, and keywords from literature. The data collection included articles published between 2012 and 2022 and the Bibliometrix and Tagcloud software were used for the investigation. The findings identified that Computer Science and Social Sciences stand out and are the most representative areas, politics, computation, community, innovation, and governance are the most relevant topics related to the subject, and decolonial agenda and contemporary feminist utopia have an important correlation also.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Participatory Design, Co-design, Democracy and Public Policy,

Palavras-chave: Participatory Design, Co-design, Democracy and Public Policy,

DOI: 10.5151/ead2023-2SAO-01Full-03Lara-Liz-Freire-et-al

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Bardzell, S. (2018). Utopias of participation: Feminism, design, and the futures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25 (1), Article 6, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127359
  • [2] Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2010). Participatory design and “democratizing innovation”. PDC '10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900448
  • [3] Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P. (2012). Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign, 8(2-3), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672577
  • [4] Blomkamp, E. (2018). The promise of co-design for public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(4), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12310
  • [5] Bødker, S., Dindler, C., Iversen, O. S., & Smith, R. C. (2022). Participatory design. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02235-7
  • [6] Bonsiepe, G. (2020). Design, cultura e sociedade [Design, culture and society]. São Paulo: Editora Blucher.
  • [7] Bour, R., Valles-Parlangeau, N., & Soule-Dupuy, C. (2019). DEMOS: une methode de conception participative pour un empowerment democratique des utilisateurs de SI [DEMOS: A participatory design method for the democratic empowerment of is users]. 37th Congres INFormatique des ORganisations et Systemes d’Information et de Decision, INFORSID 2019, 98–113.
  • [8] Brand, U. (2016). Estado e políticas públicas: sobre os processos de transformação [State and public policies: on transformation processes]. In G. Dilger, M. Lang, & J. P. Filho (Eds.), Descolonizar o imaginário. Debates sobre pós-extrativismo e alternativas ao desenvolvimento (pp. 123–137). São Paulo: Fundação Rosa Luxemburgo.
  • [9] Brand, U., Görg, C., & Wissen, M. (2011). Second-order condensations of societal power relations: Environmental politics and the internationalization of the state from a neo-poulantzian perspective. Antipode, 43(1), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00815.x
  • [10] Dahl, R. A. (2001). Sobre a democracia [About democracy]. Brasília: Editora UnB.
  • [11] Gaudio, C. del, Oliveira, A. J. de, & Franzato, C. (2015). Design participativo e inovação social: a influência dos fatores contextuais [Participatory design and social innovation: the influence of contextual factors]. IX Sustentável, 1(2), 140–141. https://doi.org/10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2015.v1.n2.140-141
  • [12] DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial Design. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8732.001.0001
  • [13] Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • [14] Fraser, N. (2020). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a 'postsocialist' age. In S. Seidman, J. C. Alexander (Eds.), The new social theory reader (pp. 188–196). London: Routledge.
  • [15] Fraser, N. (2001). Social justice in the knowledge society: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. Kongress Gut zu Wissen, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 1–13.
  • [16] Gohn, M. G. (2019). Teorias sobre a participaçãao social: desafios para a compreensão das desigualdades sociais [Theories on social participation: challenges to understanding social inequalities]. Caderno CRH , 32(85), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v32i85.27655
  • [17] Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • [18] Mariano, A., & Santos, M. (2017). Revisão da literatura: Apresentação de uma abordagem integradora [Literature review: Presentation of an integrative approach]. XXVI AEDEM International Conference, 427–443.
  • [19] Martínez Osorio, P., Barana, M., Rocha-Carneiro, R., & Paschoarelli, L. (2017). Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social: nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la contemporaneidad [Innovation, design and social sustainability: new trends for local development today]. Revista de Arquitectura, 19(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.2.1406
  • [20] Mbembe, A. (2021). Out of the dark night: Essays on decolonization. Chichester: Columbia University Press.
  • [21] Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x
  • [22] Possolo, R. C. G., & Neto, A. M. (2019). Democracia participativa brasileira: uma construção sob ataque [Brazilian participatory democracy: a construction under attack]. CSOnline, 30, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.34019/1981-2140.2019.27622
  • [23] Ranerup, A. (1998). Can internet improve democracy in local government? In R. H. Chatfield, S. Kuhn, & M. Muller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (pp. 55–64). Palo Alto: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.
  • [24] Robertson, T. (1998). Shoppers and tailors: Participative practices in small australian design companies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7, 205–221.
  • [25] Souza, C. (2006). Políticas públicas: uma revisão da literatura [Public policies: a literature review]. Sociologias, 8(16), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-45222006000200003
  • [26] Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication, 52(2), 163–174.
  • [27] Teixeira, M. A. C. (2020). Dilemas brasileiros em políticas públicas e democracia [Dilemmas about public policies and democracy in Brazil]. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761252020
  • [28] Desmet, P., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57–66. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/66/15
Como citar:

Freire, Lara Liz; Souto, Virgínia Tiradentes; Silva, Tiago Barros Pontes e; Siqueira, Nayara Moreno de; "Participatory Design and Democracy: A systematic review", p. 294-307 . In: 15th International Conference of the European Academy of Design. São Paulo: Blucher, 2023.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ead2023-2SAO-01Full-03Lara-Liz-Freire-et-al

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações