Blucher Design Proceedings

Dezembro 2020, vol.8, num.4 - XXIV International Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics
Conference full papers - Open Access Idioma principal | Segundo principal

Physical Interface for Robotic Marionette Camera (RMC): Hardware Controlling Platform for Robotic Videography Motion Design

Physical Interface for Robotic Marionette Camera (RMC): Hardware Controlling Platform for Robotic Videography Motion Design

Poustinchi, Ebrahim; Hashemi, Mona; Krivanek, Cory

Conference full papers:

This project-based research is an investigation on controlling robotic videography/camera through an interactive physical interface. Here referred to as Robotic Marionette Camera (RMC), this research project is enabling designers and videographers to design precise robotic videography scenarios and camera-paths in the physical world with similar qualities to the digital design environments.Using the ideas of a “digital” camera in design software platforms, RMC looks at concepts such as aiming, zooming in and out, panning, orbiting, and other motions/operations borrowed from cinematography, such as tilting, rolling and trucking amongst others.As a physical/hardware interface, RMC enables real-time interaction with an industrial robot arm through a custom-made hardware controller. Using a tangible interface, RMC users can design, edit, and program the robotic videography paths interactively without a need for programming knowledge.

This project-based research is an investigation on controlling robotic videography/camera through an interactive physical interface. Here referred to as Robotic Marionette Camera (RMC), this research project is enabling designers and videographers to design precise robotic videography scenarios and camera-paths in the physical world with similar qualities to the digital design environments.Using the ideas of a “digital” camera in design software platforms, RMC looks at concepts such as aiming, zooming in and out, panning, orbiting, and other motions/operations borrowed from cinematography, such as tilting, rolling and trucking amongst others.As a physical/hardware interface, RMC enables real-time interaction with an industrial robot arm through a custom-made hardware controller. Using a tangible interface, RMC users can design, edit, and program the robotic videography paths interactively without a need for programming knowledge.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/sigradi2020-82

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Braumann, J. and Brell-Cokcan S. 2011. “Parametric Robot Control.” Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) 242–51.
  • [2] Braumann, J. and Brell-Cokcan S. 2012. “Real-Time Robot Simulation and Control for Architectural Design.” Digital Physicality Proceedings of the 30th ECAADe Conference 2:479–86.
  • [3] Brugnaro G., Baharlou E., Vasey L., Menges A. 2016. “Robotic Softness: An Adaptive Robotic Fabrication Process for Woven Structures.” In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Confer-ence of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 154-163.
  • [4] Budig, M., Lim J., and Petrovic R.. 2014. “Integrating Robotic Fabrication in the Design Process.” Architectural Design 84(3): 22–43.
  • [5] Gramazio, F., Matthias K., and Jan W.. 2008. “Authoring Robotic.” Architectural Design 3(84):14–22.
  • [6] Gramazio, F., Matthias K., and Jan W.. 2008. “Authoring Robotic.” Architectural Design 3(84): 14–22.
  • [7] Kruysman, B. and Proto J. 2014, “Impossible objects,” Architectural Design 227, edited by B. Sheil.106–111.
  • [8] Lynn, G. 2008, “Robots,” in Greg Lynn Form, ed. Mark Roppolt, New York, NY: Rizzoli International Publication Inc., 251-278.
  • [9] Nof S. Y. 1999. 1 Handbook of Industrial Robotics Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons.
  • [10] Ozel, G. 2016 “Toward a postarchitecture,” Log36, 99-105
  • [11] Ozel G., 2015 “Case for an Architectural Singularity: Synchronization of Robotically Actuated Motion, Sense-Based Interaction and Computational Interface,” In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), edited by D. Gerber, Huang, and J. Sanchez , (Los Angeles, CA: ACADIA/ Riverside Architectural Press), 399–408.
  • [12] Payne, A. 2011. “A Five-Axis Robotic Motion Controller for Designers.” Integration Through Computation - Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, ACADIA 2011 162–69.
  • [13] Poustinchi, E. 2019, “Robotically Augmented Imaging (RAI Alpha)” In ACADIA 19:UBIQUITY AND AUTONOMY [Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) ISBN 978-0-578- 59179-7] (The University of Texas at Austin School of Architecture, Austin, Texas 21-26 October, 2019) pp. 352-359
  • [14] Poustinchi, E. 2019, “Oriole Beta - A Parametric Solution for Robotic Motion Design Using Animation”. Sousa, JP, Xavier, JP and Castro Henriques, G (eds.), Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution - Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference - Volume 2, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, 11-13 September 2019, pp. 227-234
  • [15] Prado, M, Dorstelmann M.,Schwinn T., Menges A., and Knippers J.. 2014. “Core-Less Filament Winding.” in Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2014, edited by W. McGee and M. Ponce De Leon. Springer.
  • [16] Retsin, G. and Manuel J. G.. 2016. “Discrete Computational Methods for Robotc Additive Manufacturing.” ACADIA 2016: Posthuman Frontiers: Data, Designers, and Cognitive Machines - Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture 332– 41.
  • [17] Schwartz, T. 2013. “HAL.” In Rob| Arch 2012, eds. Sigrid BrellÇokcan and Johannes Braumann. Springer-Verlag Wien, 92–101.
  • [18] Soler V., Retsin G., Jimenez M. G. 2017, “A Generalized Approach to Non-Layered Fused Fil-ament Fabrication”. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), Cambridge, MA, USA, 562- 571.
  • [19] Testa, P. 2017. “Imaging,” in Robot House, edited by P. Testa, New York, NY: Thames & Hudson Inc., 155-219.
  • [20] Vasey, L., Grossman T., Nagy D., Kerrick H., Atherton E., Thomasson D., Cote N., Schwinn T., Benjamin D., Conti M., Fitzmaurice G., and Menges A.. 2016. “Collaborative Construction: Human and Robot Collaboration Enabling the Fabrication and Assembly of a Filament-Wound Structure.” Pp. 184–95 in.
  • [21] Wiscombe, T. 2014, “Discreteness or towards a flat ontology of architecture.” Project, (Issue 3), 34-43.
  • [22] Yunis L., Kyjánek O., Dörstelmann M., Prado M., Schwinn T. and Menges A. 2014, “Bio-inspired and fabrication-informed design strategies for modular fibrous structures in ar- chitecture, Fusion.” In: Proceedings of the 32nd eCAADe Conference, Publisher, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, UK, 423–432.
  • [23] “Bot & Dolly Fuses 3D Animation and Industrial Automation”: 2013. Retrieved from robotics business review <https://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/consumer/bot_doll y_fuses_3d_ animation_and_industrial_automation/> (accessed 2th, July 2020).
  • [24] Munkowitz, B. G. “BOX”. Gmunk, Sep. 2013, Retrieved from <https://gmunk.com/BOX> (Accessed 2 July 2020.)
  • [25] MotorizedPrecision, Retrieved from <http://motorizedprecision.com/> (Accessed 2th, July 2020.)
Como citar:

Poustinchi, Ebrahim; Hashemi, Mona; Krivanek, Cory; "Physical Interface for Robotic Marionette Camera (RMC): Hardware Controlling Platform for Robotic Videography Motion Design", p-594-599. In: Congreso SIGraDi 2020. São Paulo: Blucher, 2020.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/sigradi2020-82

últimos 30 dias

138
downloads

259
visualizações

792
indexações