Simulation of supersonic flow: comparison of LES against URANS and RANS turbulence models

Simulation of supersonic flow: comparison of LES against URANS and RANS turbulence models

Medeiros, R. B.; Fusco, J. M.; Ropelato, K.; Aliatti, G.

Full Article:

This study aims to analyze the influence of different turbulence models in capturing the flow profile in supersonic nozzles as ones used in steam jet ejectors. Based on the recent experiments by T. Sriveerakul.; S. Aphornratana.; K. Chunnanond[International Journal of Thermal Sciences 46 (2007) 812-822] computations were performed using three different turbulence models, a modified RANS model (SST k-ω), a URANS model with Scale Adaptative Simulation - SAS and the large eddy simulation (LES), with three different steam jet operational conditions, the simulation results were compared with experimental data. First, SAS and SST k-ω computations were performed with three meshes with different refinement level on a mesh independency study. It was observed that SAS model was more sensitive with mesh refinement. In less refined mesh the pressure profile obtained was very close to SST k-ω results indicating that mesh refinement and time step weren’t enough to activate the source term included in ω. With two other meshes a SAS convergence was observed while these meshes are refined enough to use LES. LES time average values of the variables under study on the most refined mesh were included in the comparison. Furthermore Mach number plots along the equipment center line showed the shock waves formation and the pressure profile recuperation that occurs in the diffuser. The RANS SST k-ω turbulence model results showed the smallest errors related to the experimental data.

This study aims to analyze the influence of different turbulence models in capturing the flow profile in supersonic nozzles as ones used in steam jet ejectors. Based on the recent experiments by T. Sriveerakul.; S. Aphornratana.; K. Chunnanond[International Journal of Thermal Sciences 46 (2007) 812-822] computations were performed using three different turbulence models, a modified RANS model (SST k-ω), a URANS model with Scale Adaptative Simulation - SAS and the large eddy simulation (LES), with three different steam jet operational conditions, the simulation results were compared with experimental data. First, SAS and SST k-ω computations were performed with three meshes with different refinement level on a mesh independency study. It was observed that SAS model was more sensitive with mesh refinement. In less refined mesh the pressure profile obtained was very close to SST k-ω results indicating that mesh refinement and time step weren’t enough to activate the source term included in ω. With two other meshes a SAS convergence was observed while these meshes are refined enough to use LES. LES time average values of the variables under study on the most refined mesh were included in the comparison. Furthermore Mach number plots along the equipment center line showed the shock waves formation and the pressure profile recuperation that occurs in the diffuser. The RANS SST k-ω turbulence model results showed the smallest errors related to the experimental data.

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/meceng-wccm2012-18813

Referências bibliográficas

• [1] MAN, H. C.; DUAN, J.;YUE, T.M.; Design and Characteristic Analysis of Supersonic Nozzles for high Gas Pressure Laser Cutting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1997.
• [2] SCOTT, D.; AIDOUN, Z.; OUZANNE, M.; CFD Simulations of a Supersonic Ejector for Use in Refrigeration Application. International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, 2008.
• [3] SRIVEERAKUL, T.; APHORNRATANA, S.; CHUNNANOND, K.; Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: Part 1. Validation of the CFD results. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2006.
• [4] ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide, 2010.
• [5] ANSYS FLUENT USERS GUIDE, 2010.
• [6] J. H. KEENAN, E.P. NEUMANN, A simple air ejector, ASME: Journal of Applied Mechanics 64 (1942).
• [7] K. CHUNNANOND, S. APHORNRATANA, An Experimental investigation of a steam ejector. Applied Thermal Engineering 27 (2004).
• [8] ESDU, Ejector and jet pump, ESDU International Ltd, London, Data item 86030, 1985.
• [9] S. APHORNRATANA, I.W. EAMES, A small capacity steam-ejector refrigerator: experimental investigation of a system using with movable primary nozzle, International Journal of Refrigeration 20 (5) (1997).
• [10] J. SMAGORINSKY, General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91 (1963).
• [11] A. KARVINEN, H. AHLSTEDT, Comparison of turbulence models in case of jet cross flow using commercial CDF code. Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments 6 (2005).
• [12] J. FROHLICH, D. VON TERZI, Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 44 (2008) 349-377.

Como citar:

Medeiros, R. B.; Fusco, J. M.; Ropelato, K.; Aliatti, G.; "Simulation of supersonic flow: comparison of LES against URANS and RANS turbulence models", p-2322-2332. In: In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Computational Mechanics [= Blucher Mechanical Engineering Proceedings, v. 1, n. 1]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2014.
ISSN 23580828, DOI 10.5151/meceng-wccm2012-18813