Maio 2021 vol. 8 num. 2 - V Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação

Artigo completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Tecnologias emergentes em setores tecnologicamente maduros? Explorando a emergência do processamento submarino de petróleo e gás natural sob a perspectiva dos sistemas tecnológicos de inovação (1990-2019)

Emerging technologies in established sectors? Exploring the emergence of subsea oil & gas processing through technological innovation systems approach (1990-2019)

Pereta, Matheus Gonçalves da Silva ; Furtado, André Tosi ; Costa, Janaína Oliveira Pamplona da ;

Artigo completo:

Este artigo explora o processo de emergência do sistema de processamento submarino na indústria mundial de petróleo e gás natural entre 1990-2019. São considerados cinco subsistemas relacionados ao SPS: compressão submarina de gás; estimulação submarina; separação submarina; tratamento e (re)injeção e aquecimento ativo das linhas de fluxo. A fim de compreender como a dinâmica de interação entre os atores e instituições envolvidos em atividades de inovação em SPS se articula com o seu processo de emergência tecnológica, realizou-se uma análise das funções dos sistemas tecnológicos de inovação (STI), a partir de dados de projetos demonstrativos, publicações científicas e patentes. Os principais resultados da análise das funções do STI identificaram que a atividade experimental, a produção e difusão de novos conhecimentos operam positivamente para a emergência do SPS no período analisado, enquanto a orientação da busca e a criação de legitimidade se caracterizam como falhas sistêmicas que explicam, parcialmente, as barreiras à difusão dessas tecnologias emergentes (TE) no setor. Sendo assim, este trabalho se propõe a contribuir para o debate sobre políticas públicas e inovação em setores estabelecidos, além de refletir sobre o papel dos países em desenvolvimento em áreas tecnológicas emergentes.

Artigo completo:

This paper explores the emergence of subsea processing systems (SPS) in the oil and gas industry during the period 1990-2019. Five subsystems related to SPS are considered: subsea gas compression; subsea boosting; subsea water treatment and injection; subsea separation, and direct electric heating. To understand how the dynamics of interaction among actors and institutions involved in innovation activities in SPS are interconnected with its process of emergence, an analysis of the functions of technological innovation systems (TIS) was carried out, based on data from demonstration projects, scientific publications, and patents. The main results of the analysis of the TIS functions identified that the experimental activity, production, and diffusion of new knowledge operate positively for the emergence of the SPS while guidance of the search and creation of legitimacy are characterized as systemic failures that, partially, explain the current barriers to the diffusion of these emerging technologies in the offshore oil & gas sector. Therefore, this paper aims to contribute to the debate on public policies and innovation in established sectors, in addition to reflecting on the role of developing countries in emerging technological areas.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Tecnologias emergentes; Sistema tecnológico de inovação; Funções dos sistemas de inovação; Indústria do petróleo offshore; Equipamentos de produção submarina,

Palavras-chave: Emerging technologies; Technological innovation systems; Function Analysis; Offshore oil industry; Subsea production systems,

DOI: 10.5151/v-enei-646

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ALBUQUERQUE, F. A. et al. Subsea Processing Systems: Future Vision. . In: OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE. Offshore Technology Conference, 6 maio 2013Disponível em: . Acesso em: 13 maio. 2020
  • [2] ARTHUR, W. B. The structure of invention. Research Policy, v. 36, n. 2, p. 274–287, 1 mar. 2007.
  • [3] ARTHUR, W. B. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. [s.l.] Simon and Schuster, 2009.
  • [4] AUTIO, E.; HAMERI, A. The structure and dynamics of technological systems: A conceptual model. Technology & Society, v. 17, n. 04, p. 365–384, 1995.
  • [5] BAI, Q.; BAI, Y. Subsea engineering handbook. 2. ed. [s.l.] Gulf Professional Publishing, 2018.
  • [6] BARLOW, J. Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research Policy, v. 29, n. 7, p. 973–989, 1 ago. 2000.
  • [7] BENTO, N.; FONTES, M. Emergence of floating offshore wind energy: Technology and industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 99, p. 66–82, 1 jan. 2019.
  • [8] BERGEK, A. et al. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, v. 37, p. 407–429, 200
  • [9] BERGEK, A. et al. Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 16, p. 51–64, 1 set. 2015.
  • [10] BP. BP Energy Outlook 2019. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 out. 2019.
  • [11] CARLSSON, B. (ED.). Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics. [s.l.] Springer US, 1997.
  • [12] CARLSSON, B. et al. Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, Innovation Systems. v. 31, n. 2, p. 233–245, 1 fev. 2002.
  • [13] CARLSSON, B.; STANKIEWICZ, R. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, v. 1, n. 2, p. 93–118, 1 jun. 1991.
  • [14] CARPENTER, C. How Will Subsea-Processing Technologies Enable Deepwater-Field Developments? Journal of Petroleum Technology, v. 69, n. 08, p. 62–63, 1 ago. 2017.
  • [15] FAGERBERG, J. Innovation: A Guide to the Literature. 2004.
  • [16] FURTADO, A. T. A trajetória tecnológica da Petrobrás na produção offshore. Revista Espacios, v. 17, n. 3, 1996.
  • [17] FURTADO, A. T. Mudança institucional e inovação na indústria brasileira de petróleo. Revsta Brasileira de Energia, v. 9, p. 1–12, 2003.
  • [18] FURTADO, A. T.; FREITAS, A. G. The Catch-up Strategy of Petrobrás through Cooperative R&D. The Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 25, n. 1, p. 23–36, 1 mar. 2000.
  • [19] FURTADO, A. T.; HEKKERT, M. P.; NEGRO, S. O. Of actors, functions, and fuels: Exploring a second generation ethanol transition from a technological innovation systems perspective in Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 70, p. 101706, 1 dez. 2020.
  • [20] HAMMET, D. S.; LUKE, J. M. Success and failure: Subsea completions. OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS. Anais... In: OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE. Houston: maio 1986
  • [21] HEKKERT, M. P. et al. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 74, n. 4, p. 413–432, maio 2007.
  • [22] HICKS et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, v. 520, p. 429–431, 23 abr. 2015.
  • [23] IEA. World Energy Outlook 2018. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 out. 2019.
  • [24] IEA (ED.). World Energy Investment 2019, 2019.
  • [25] JACOBSSON, S.; BERGEK, A. Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 13, n. 5, p. 815–849, 1 out. 2004.
  • [26] JACOBSSON, S.; BERGEK, A. Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 1, n. 1, p. 41–57, 1 jun. 2011.
  • [27] JONES, J. W. Subsea production systems – Trends in the nineties. OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS. Anais... In: OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE. Houston: 1995
  • [28] KANGER, L.; SCHOT, J. Deep transitions: Theorizing the long-term patterns of socio-technical change. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, How History Matters for the Governance of Sociotechnical Transitions. v. 32, p. 7–21, 1 set. 2019.
  • [29] KEMP, A. The Official History of North Sea Oil and Gas : Vol. II: Moderating the State’s Role. [s.l.] Routledge, 2013a.
  • [30] KEMP, A. The Official History of North Sea Oil and Gas : Vol. I: The Growing Dominance of the State. [s.l.] Routledge, 2013b.
  • [31] LANDES, D. The unbound Prometheus: technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • [32] LEGEAY, J.; HAZEL, T.; PEREGRYM, G. Powering Subsea Processing Facilities of the Future. . In: OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE. Offshore Technology Conference, 6 maio 2013Disponível em: . Acesso em: 13 maio. 2020
  • [33] MÄKITIE, T. et al. Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector’s influence on offshore wind power. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 177, p. 813–823, 10 mar. 2018.
  • [34] MARKARD, J. The life cycle of technological innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 153, p. 119407, 1 abr. 2020.
  • [35] MASON, P. Evolution of subsea well system technology. OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS. Anais... In: OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE. Houston: jul. 2006
  • [36] MCKINSEY (ED.). The future of oil and gas is now: How companies can decarbonize, 7 jan. 2020. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 15 ago. 2020
  • [37] MOED, H. F.; GLÄNZEL, W.; SCHMOCH, U. (EDS.). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2005.
  • [38] NEGRO, S. O.; HEKKERT, M. P.; SMITS, R. E. Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion—A functional analysis. Energy Policy, v. 35, n. 2, p. 925–938, 1 fev. 2007.
  • [39] NETO, J. B. O.; SHIMA, W. T. Trajetórias tecnológicas no segmento offshore: ambiente e oportunidades. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, v. 12, n. 2, p. 301–332, ago. 2008.
  • [40] OFFSHORE MAGAZINE; INTECSEA. 2019 Worldwide survey of active heating, fev. 2019a. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 21 jan. 2020
  • [41] OFFSHORE MAGAZINE; INTECSEA (EDS.). 2019 Worldwide survey of subsea processing, mar. 2019b. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 21 jan. 2020
  • [42] RIBEIRO, C. et al. The influence of user-supplier relationship oninnovation dynamics of Oil & Gas industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 32, n. 2, p. 119–132, 2020.
  • [43] ROTOLO, D.; HICKS, D.; MARTIN, B. R. What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, v. 44, n. 10, p. 1827–1843, 1 dez. 2015.
  • [44] RUAS, J. A. G. Dinâmica de concorrência na indústria parapetrolífera offshore: evolução mundial do setor de equipamentos subsea e o caso brasileiro. Tese (Doutorado)—Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2012.
  • [45] RUUD, T. et al. All Subsea: A Vision for the Future of Subsea Processing. . In: OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE. Offshore Technology Conference, 4 maio 2015Disponível em: . Acesso em: 13 maio. 2020
  • [46] SCHOT, J.; GEELS, F. W. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 20, n. 5, p. 537–554, 1 set. 2008.
  • [47] SUURS, R. A. A. Motors of sustainable innovation. Towards a theory of the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2009.
  • [48] THE GUARDIAN. What do we know about the top 20 global polluters? 9 out. 2019.
  • [49] ZHANG, G. et al. Giant discoveries of oil and gas fields in global deepwaters in the past 40 years and the prospect of exploration. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1–28, 1 fev. 2019.
Como citar:

Pereta, Matheus Gonçalves da Silva; Furtado, André Tosi; Costa, Janaína Oliveira Pamplona da; "Tecnologias emergentes em setores tecnologicamente maduros? Explorando a emergência do processamento submarino de petróleo e gás natural sob a perspectiva dos sistemas tecnológicos de inovação (1990-2019)", p. 488-508 . In: Anais do V Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação (ENEI): “Inovação, Sustentabilidade e Pandemia”. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/v-enei-646

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações