Telling a New Learning Story

Suzanne E. Martin

doi:10.5151/ead2021-149

Blucher Design Proceedings

Dezembro 2021, vol.9, num.5 - 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research

Full Paper - Open Access Idioma principal | Segundo principal

Telling a New Learning Story

Martin, Suzanne E.

Full Paper:

This paper sets out the possibility of changing the Design Learning conversation to one that reaches across design to the creative industries as a whole, and beyond. It suggests using Participatory Design techniques to shape transdisciplinary, creative knowledge and the growth of Communities of Interest (CoI) through the establishment of a Designed Learning Framework, being piloted within the Creative Futures Academy (CFA) - a newly funded government initiative in Ireland. The author is part of the small team at the National College of Art and Design (NCAD), lead partner in a coalition of 3 Higher Education Institutions, building this CFA model. The knowledge generated within her recent research - investigating the design learning conversation within Higher Education being re-framed as a change-creation story to bridge the needs of institutions, private sector studios and multinationals – is helping inform and drive this first year of CFA development toward bold and curious approaches to curriculum design.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/ead2021-149

Referências bibliográficas

[1] "Antonelli, P. (2019). Broken Nature: Design Takes on Human Survival (Triennale De Milano). Rizzoli Electa.
[2]
[3] Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., and Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending The Individual Human Mind
[4]
[5] Creating Shared Understanding Through Collaborative Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(1), 84-113.
[6]
[7] Bang, A. L. (2010). Emotional Value of Applied Textiles. PhD Thesis, Design School Kolding.
[8]
[9] Berardi, F. (2013). Autonomy and General Intellect. Contestations: Learning from Critical Experiments in Education. Bedford Press.
[10]
[11] Boelen, J. (2018). Design as Learning: A School of Schools Reader. Valiz
[12]
[13] Boud, D. and Solomon, N. (2001). Work-based Learning: a New Higher Education?. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
[14]
[15] Boym, C, (2010) Teaching in a Time of Uncertainty, Design Observer. Available: from
[16]
[17] http://designobserver.com/feature/teaching-in-a-time-of-uncertainty/14378/ (Accessed on 6 September 2020]
[18]
[19] Chabot, J. (2013). Reflections on Art Education. Re-Inventing the Art School 21st Century. WDKA.
[20]
[21] Colomina, B., Kotsioris, E., Galan, I. and Meister, A. (2015). The Radical Pedagogies Project. Learning Network,
[22]
[23] 45.
[24]
[25] Danvers, J. (2003). Towards a Radical Pedagogy: Provisional Notes on Learning And Teaching in Art & Design.
[26]
[27] International Journal of Art & Design Education, 22(1), pp.47-57.
[28]
[29] Davies, H. and Turpin, E. (2015). Art & Death: Life Between The Fifth Assessment and Sixth Extinction in Art. The
[30]
[31] Anthropocene: Encounters Among Aesthetics, ed. Davies, H and Turpin, E. Open Universities Press.
[32]
[33] Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity And Education: Inquiries Into Learning, Teaching, And Research.
[34]
[35] Psychology Press.
[36]
[37] DBEI, (2020). Together for Design: Digital, Product and Strategic Design Skills of the Future. DBEI
[38]
[39] Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2010). The Practice of Leadership in The Messy World of Organizations.
[40]
[41] Leadership, 6(1), 67-88.
[42]
[43] de Vet, A. ed. (2020). Design Dedication – Adaptive Mentalities in Design Education. Valiz.
[44]
[45] Dorst, K. (2015). Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. MIT press.
[46]
[47] Escobar, A. (2018). Designs For The Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, And The Making of
[48]
[49] Worlds. Duke University Press.
[50]
[51] Foth, M. and Axup, J. (2006). Participatory Design And Action Research: Identical Twins or Synergetic Pair?. In
[52]
[53] Expanding Boundaries in Design: Proceedings Ninth Participatory Design Conference 2006 (Vol 2) 93-96. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.
[54]
[55] Gadgil, S. (2016), Back To School, Creative Review (September 2016), 32 – 36.
[56]
[57] Garwin, D.A. (1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 73-91.
[58]
[59] Gaver, W.W., Beaver, J. and Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a Resource For Design. Proceedings of The
[60]
[61] SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 233-240.
[62]
[63] HEA – Access Statistics Summary. Available: from https://hea.ie/policy/access-policy/access-statistics-summary/ (accessed on 23 August 2021)
[64]
[65] Hillgren, P.A., Seravalli, A. and Emilson, A. (2011). Prototyping and Infrastructuring in Design For Social
[66]
[67] Innovation. CoDesign, 7(3-4), pp.169-183.
[68]
[69] Huybrechts, L., Storni, C., Lee, Y., Schepers, S., Schoffelen, J. and Dreessen, K. (2014). Participation is Risky.
[70]
[71] Approaches to Joint Creative Processes (Vol. 13). Valiz.
[72]
[73] Huybrechts, L., Benesch, H., & Geib, J. (2017). Institutioning: Participatory design, Co-design And The Public
[74]
[75] Realm. CoDesign, 13(3), 148-159.
[76]
[77] IDEO (2009). The Human-Centred Design Toolkit. IDEO
[78]
[79] Ivison, T. and Vandeputte, T. (2013). Contestations: Learning from Critical Experiments in Education.
[80]
[81] Bedford Press.
[82]
[83] Jackson, N. J. (2011). Learning For a Complex World: A Lifewide Concept of Learning, Education and Personal
[84]
[85] Development. Authorhouse.
[86]
[87] Karasti, H. (2014). Infrastructuring in Participatory Design. Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design
[88]
[89] Conference: Research Papers-Volume 1 (pp. 141-150).
[90]
[91] Kimbell, L. (2014). ‘Some Futures For Art and Design Institutions’. UKADIA Conference. Available: from
[92]
[93] https://ukadia.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Lucy-Kimbell-transcript-260214.pdf (Accessed on 20 May 2021]
[94]
[95] Koyo Kouoh, K. (2020). Never Despair, Your Miracle is Around the Corner: The Multiple Forms of Designing the
[96]
[97] Social. Broken Nature: Design Takes on Human Survival (Triennale De Milano). Rizzoli Electa.
[98]
[99] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
[100]
[101] Marsick, V.J. and Watkins, K.E. (2003). Demonstrating The Value of an Organization’s Learning Culture: the
[102]
[103] Dimensions of The Learning Organization Questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), pp.132-151.
[104]
[105] Mau, B. (2020). Bruce Mau: MC24: Bruce Mau’s 24 Principles for Designing Massive Change in your Life and
[106]
[107] Work. Phaidon.
[108]
[109] McDonough, W. and Braungart, M. (2002). Remaking The Way we Make Things: Cradle to cradle. North Point Press, p.104.
[110]
[111] Møller, T., Petersen, L. R. M., & Bang, A. L. (2016). Tangible Dialogue Tools: Mediating Between Nonverbal
[112]
[113] Users and Everyday Experts.
[114]
[115] Mootee, I. (2013). Design Thinking for Strategic Innovation: What They Can’t Teach you at Business or Design
[116]
[117] School. John Wiley & Sons.
[118]
[119] Muratovski, G. (2020). Don Norman: The Future of Design Education, Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b U6gyTZyoQ&list=PLBc7sGyArxaZ3u6kxCN0qVvvDT9TcVnQM&index=5 (Accessed 2 January 2021).
[120]
[121] Owens, J. (2019) 10 Principles of Life Centered Design: How We May Begin to Design for a Future of Inclusivity. https://medium.com/the-sentient-files/10-principles-of-life-centered-design-3c5f543414f3 (Accessed 10 August 2020).
[122]
[123] Petti, A . (2015). Decolonising Knowledge. Volume 45: Learning. Archis.
[124]
[125] Powers, M. N. (2017). Self-regulated Design Learning – A Foundation and Framework for Teaching and Learning
[126]
[127] Design. Routledge
[128]
[129] Rawsthorne, A. (2018). Design as an Attitude. JRP.
[130]
[131] Renfro, C. (2009). Undesigning The New Art School. Art School Propositions for the 21st Century. MIT Press.
[132]
[133] Rodgers, P. and Bremner, C. eds. (2019). Design School: After Boundaries and Disciplines. Vernon Press.
[134]
[135] Sanders, E.B.N. and Stappers, P.J. (2012). Convivial Toolbox – Generative Research for the Front End of
[136]
[137] Design. BIS.
[138]
[139] Sanoff, H. (1990). Participatory Design: Theory & Techniques. Henry Sanoff.
[140]
[141] Sholette, G. (2013). Counting on Your Collective Silence: Notes on Activist Art as Collaborative Practice.
[142]
[143] Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. eds. (1993). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. CRC Press.
[144]
[145] Shulman, L.S. (2005). Signature Pedagogies in the Professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59.
[146]
[147] Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. eds. (2012). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge.
[148]
[149] Simonsen, J. ed. (2014). Situated design methods. MIT Press.
[150]
[151] Smith, R. C., & Iversen, O. S. (2018). Participatory Design for Sustainable Social Change. Design Studies, 59, 9
[152]
[153] 36.
[154]
[155] Thackara, J. (2015). How to Thrive in The Next Economy. Thames & Hudson.
[156]
[157] Tickner, L. (2008). Hornsey 1968: The Art School Revolution. Frances Lincoln ltd.
[158]
[159] Vidokle, A. (2006). Exhibition as a School in a Divided City, Notes for an Art School. Manifesta 6.
[160]
[161] Zengelis, E. (2015). ‘A Revolutionary Suggestion’. Volume 45: Learning. Archis. "
[162]

Como citar:

Martin, Suzanne E.; "Telling a New Learning Story", p-90-97. In: 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/ead2021-149

últimos 30 dias

133
downloads

212
visualizações

940
indexações

Blucher Design Proceedings

Telling a New Learning Story

Telling a New Learning Story

Full Paper:

Referências bibliográficas

Como citar:

Sobre a Blucher

Para você

Outros