THE RECEPTION OF HUME IN ROMANCE LANGUAGES: FRENCH AND PORTUGUESE

THE RECEPTION OF HUME IN ROMANCE LANGUAGES: FRENCH AND PORTUGUESE

Hollanda, L.

Artigo:

Indeed, the most of myths about Hume’s philosophy rest on the precarious term empiricist. J. P.Monteiro, impeaching this conception, had proposed deep revisions in interpretations of Hume’sphilosophy, such as the rebuttal of any Humean cognitive associationism. Gilles Deleuze, on the otherhand, had stated that causal inferences play a crucial role for the constitution of human nature in Hume’sthought. In line with Deleuze, but far from Monteiro’s interpretation, Gerard Lebrun depicted Hume as afree spirit and the most ingenuous sceptic. This text, which strictly handled with Portuguese and Frenchcommentators, is the first one of a series of texts that I intend to release in order to spread into English keycommentaries about Hume’s philosophy published in Romance languages. This paper, as well as someother onesthat are coming, aimed atshedding light on the manner as Hume’s philosophy was undertakenin Romance languages. In view of this, it was taken - as this text main base - the aforementioned Romancecommentators, as I named the group of Hume’s commentators who had written in Romance languages.

Indeed, the most of myths about Hume’s philosophy rest on the precarious term empiricist. J. P.Monteiro, impeaching this conception, had proposed deep revisions in interpretations of Hume’sphilosophy, such as the rebuttal of any Humean cognitive associationism. Gilles Deleuze, on the otherhand, had stated that causal inferences play a crucial role for the constitution of human nature in Hume’sthought. In line with Deleuze, but far from Monteiro’s interpretation, Gerard Lebrun depicted Hume as afree spirit and the most ingenuous sceptic. This text, which strictly handled with Portuguese and Frenchcommentators, is the first one of a series of texts that I intend to release in order to spread into English keycommentaries about Hume’s philosophy published in Romance languages. This paper, as well as someother onesthat are coming, aimed atshedding light on the manner as Hume’s philosophy was undertakenin Romance languages. In view of this, it was taken - as this text main base - the aforementioned Romancecommentators, as I named the group of Hume’s commentators who had written in Romance languages.

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/sofia2017-05

Referências bibliográficas

• [1] DELEUZE, Gilles. Empirisme et subjectivité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France – PUF, 2001.
• [2]
• [3] HOLLANDA, L. Fifteen years of a classic: New Humean Studies. Prometheus, v. 10, n. 23, May-
• [4] August., 2017.
• [5]
• [6] LEBRUN, Gérard. La Boutade de Charing Cross. Manuscrito, Campinas, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 65-84, 1978.
• [7] ______. Hume e a astúcia de Kant. In: TORRES FILHO, Rubens Rodrigues (ed.). Sobre Kant. São
• [8] Paulo: Iluminuras, 2011.
• [9] MONTEIRO, João Paulo. Novos Estudos Humeanos. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial, 2003.
• [10] ______. Novos Estudos Humeanos. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional/Casa da Moeda, 2003.
• [11] ______. Hume e a Epistemologia. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional/Casa da Moeda, 1984.
• [12] ______. Hume e a Epistemologia. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, Discurso Editorial, 2009.

Como citar:

Hollanda, L.; "THE RECEPTION OF HUME IN ROMANCE LANGUAGES: FRENCH AND PORTUGUESE", p-79-93. In: . São Paulo: Blucher, 2018.
ISSN 23586567, DOI 10.5151/sofia2017-05