Dezembro 2021 vol. 9 num. 5 - 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research

Full Paper - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

The Ten Principles of Socially Responsible Digital Health Design

The Ten Principles of Socially Responsible Digital Health Design

Tsekleves, Emmanuel ; Cooper, Rachel ;

Full Paper:

We are now, more than ever, aware of the social challenges that face us globally, keeping healthy is at the top of the list. Increasingly in the last ten years, designers have turned their attention not just to designing to alleviate and prevent illness but designing specifically to increase individual and community wellness and health. Digital health design has been one of those dimensions adopted to address the challenge. In this opinion piece we posit that in the domain of digital health all design should be socially responsible in order for us to consider it good design. Drawing on the history of socially responsible design and the emergence of digital health applications we propose Ten Principles of Socially Responsible Digital Health Design.

Full Paper:

We are now, more than ever, aware of the social challenges that face us globally, keeping healthy is at the top of the list. Increasingly in the last ten years, designers have turned their attention not just to designing to alleviate and prevent illness but designing specifically to increase individual and community wellness and health. Digital health design has been one of those dimensions adopted to address the challenge. In this opinion piece we posit that in the domain of digital health all design should be socially responsible in order for us to consider it good design. Drawing on the history of socially responsible design and the emergence of digital health applications we propose Ten Principles of Socially Responsible Digital Health Design.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Responsible design, digital health, good design, responsible innovation,

Palavras-chave: Responsible design, digital health, good design, responsible innovation,

DOI: 10.5151/ead2021-181

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "Awad, A., Trenfield, S. J., Gaisford, S., & Basit, A. W. (2018). 3D printed medicines: A new branch of digital healthcare. International journal of pharmaceutics, 548(1), 586-596.
  • [2] Britten, N., Ekman, I., Naldemirci, Ö., Javinger, M., Hedman, H., & Wolf, A. (2020). Learning from Gothenburg model of person centred healthcare. bmj, 370.
  • [3] Brosschot, J. F., Verkuil, B., & Thayer, J. F. (2016). The default response to uncertainty and the importance of perceived safety in anxiety and stress: An evolution-theoretical perspective. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 41, 22-34.
  • [4] Buckminster Fuller, R. (1963) World Design Science Decade Phase 1 Document 1, Estate of Buckminster Fuller, Google Books
  • [5] Buetow, S. (2016). Person-centred health care: balancing the welfare of clinicians and patients. Routledge.
  • [6] Chameettachal, S., Yeleswarapu, S., Sasikumar, S., Shukla, P., Hibare, P., Bera, A. K., ... & Pati, F. (2019). 3D Bioprinting: Recent Trends and Challenges. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 99(3), 375-403.
  • [7] Chen, D. S., Cheng, L. L., Hummels, C. C. M., & Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: an introduction. International Journal of Design, 10(1), 1-5.
  • [8] Cooper, R., (2005). Ethics and altruism: what constitutes socially responsible design? DesignManagement Review, 16 (3), 10–1
  • [9] Cooper, R., Boyko, C. T., & Cooper, C. (2011). Design for health: the relationship between design and noncommunicable diseases. Journal of health communication, 16(sup2), 134-157.
  • [10] Cooper, R., (2019) Design research – Its 50-year transformation Design Studies. 65, 6-17.
  • [11] Eaton, S., Roberts, S. and Turner, B., (2015). Delivering person centred care in long term conditions. BMJ, 350, p.h181.
  • [12] Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., Feng, Z., & Vlachantoni, A. (2016). Ethnic inequalities in limiting health and self-reported health in later life revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health, 70(7), 653-662.
  • [13] Fiske, A., Buyx, A., & Prainsack, B. (2020). The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 260, 113174.
  • [14] Ghani, F., Tsekleves, E., & Thomas, Y. F. (2021). Urbanization and Cities as Drivers of Global Health. In I. Kickbusch, D. Ganten, & M. Moeti (Eds.), Handbook of Global Health (pp. 1-28). Springer International
  • [15] Gilbert, F., O’Connell, C. D., Mladenovska, T., & Dodds, S. (2018). Print me an organ? Ethical and regulatory issues emerging from 3D bioprinting in medicine. Science and engineering ethics, 24(1), 73-91.
  • [16] Gillon, R. (1994). Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. British Medical Journal, 309(6948), 184.
  • [17] Gitlow, L. (2014). Technology use by older adults and barriers to using technology. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 32(3), 271-280.
  • [18] Graham, M. (2014). Inequitable distributions in Internet geographies: The global south is gaining access, but lags in local content. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 9(3-4), 3-19.
  • [19] Gwatkin, D. R. (2000). Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do?. Bulletin of the world health organization, 78, 3-18.
  • [20] Jacobs, G., van der Zijpp, T., van Lieshout, F., & van Dulmen, S. (2017). Research into person-centred healthcare technology: A plea for considering humanization dimensions. Person-Centred Healthcare Research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 61-68.
  • [21] Jung, C., & Padman, R. (2015). Disruptive digital innovation in healthcare delivery: the case for patient portals and online clinical consultations. In The handbook of service innovation (pp. 297-318). Springer, London.
  • [22] Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S. V., & Almeida-Filho, N. (2002). A glossary for health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 56(9), 647-652.
  • [23] Majumder, S., Mondal, T., & Deen, M. J. (2017). Wearable sensors for remote health monitoring. Sensors, 17(1), 130.
  • [24] Makri, A. (2019). Bridging the digital divide in health care. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(5), e204-e205.
  • [25] Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The lancet, 365(9464), 1099-1104.
  • [26] Marmot, M. (2013). Health inequalities in the EU. Final report of a consortium. European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumers. https://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/social_determinants/docs/healthinequalitiesineu_2013_en.pdf
  • [27] McGhin, T., Choo, K. K. R., Liu, C. Z., & He, D. (2019). Blockchain in healthcare applications: Research challenges and opportunities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 135, 62-75.
  • [28] Mitchell, U. A., Chebli, P. G., Ruggiero, L., & Muramatsu, N. (2019). The digital divide in health-related technology use: The significance of race/ethnicity. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 6-14.
  • [29] Moore, L., Britten, N., Lydahl, D., Naldemirci, Ö., Elam, M., & Wolf, A. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person‐centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 31(4), 662-673.
  • [30] McCormack, B., van Dulmen, S., Eide, H., Skovdahl, K., & Eide, T. (Eds.). (2017). Person-centred healthcare research. John Wiley & Sons.
  • [31] Neter, E., & Brainin, E. (2012). eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(1), e19.
  • [32] Neubauer, A. B., Smyth, J. M., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2018). When you see it coming: Stressor anticipation modulates stress effects on negative affect. Emotion, 18(3), 342.
  • [33] Liddy, C., Blazkho, V., & Mill, K. (2014). Challenges of self-management when living with multiple chronic conditions: systematic review of the qualitative literature. Canadian Family Physician, 60(12), 1123-11
  • [34] López, L., Green, A. R., Tan-McGrory, A., King, R. S., & Betancourt, J. R. (2011). Bridging the digital divide in health care: the role of health information technology in addressing racial and ethnic disparities. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 37(10), 437-445.
  • [35] Papanek, V (1971) Design for the Real World : Human Ecology and Social Change. New York, Pantheon Books
  • [36] Pulvirenti, M., McMillan, J., & Lawn, S. (2014). Empowerment, patient centred care and self‐management. Health Expectations, 17(3), 303-310.
  • [37] Rams, D. (2009). Dieter Rams: ten principles for good design. From Vitsoe.com: https://www.vitsoe.com/gb/about/good-design
  • [38] Read, J. N. G., & Gorman, B. K. (2010). Gender and health inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 371-386.
  • [39] Ricciardi, W., & Boccia, S. (2017). New challenges of public health: bringing the future of personalised healthcare into focus. European journal of public health, 27(suppl_4), 36-
  • [40] Russell, S., Ogunbayo, O. J., Newham, J. J., Heslop-Marshall, K., Netts, P., Hanratty, B., ... & Kaner, E. (2018). Qualitative systematic review of barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: views of patients and healthcare professionals. NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 28(1), 1-13.
  • [41] Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368-383.
  • [42] Tsekleves, E. and Cooper, C. (Eds.) (2017). Design for Health. (Design for Social Responsibility). London: Routledge.
  • [43] Tsekleves, E., Cooper, R., & Spenser, J. (Eds.) (2021). Design for Global Challenges and Goals. (Design for Social Responsibility). Routledge.
  • [44] Vermeulen, N., Haddow, G., Seymour, T., Faulkner-Jones, A., & Shu, W. (2017). 3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(9), 618-624.
  • [45] Vijayavenkataraman, S., Yan, W. C., Lu, W. F., Wang, C. H., & Fuh, J. Y. H. (2018). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 132, 296-332.
  • [46] Von Dawans, B., Fischbacher, U., Kirschbaum, C., Fehr, E., & Heinrichs, M. (2012). The social dimension of stress reactivity: acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans. Psychological science, 23(6), 651-660.
  • [47] Woodward, A., & Kawachi, I. (2000). Why reduce health inequalities?. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54(12), 923-929.
  • [48] "
Como citar:

Tsekleves, Emmanuel; Cooper, Rachel; "The Ten Principles of Socially Responsible Digital Health Design ", p. 326-337 . In: 14th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Safe Harbours for Design Research. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ead2021-181

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações