The Transposable Limits of Open Design for Sustainable Development

-

Argenton Freire, Rodrigo; Ziggiatti Monteiro, Evandro

Artigo:

In this study, we defined a set of parameters to evaluate openness, social inclusiveness, economic viability and environmental responsibility in Open Design (OD) Projects. We compared the parameters of eight OD cases of different nature and scale related to the built environment. We identified current limitations to the application of OD in developing countries and developed a set of recommendations to improve openness and guarantee sustainable practices. Results show that social inclusiveness is limited to the existence of digital fabrication tools and collaboration platforms, there is a lack of information concerning environmental aspects and there are positive perspectives for local businesses and job creation.

-

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/sigradi2018-1598

Referências bibliográficas

• [1] Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375. Balka, K. (2011). Open Source Product Development: the meaning and relevance of openness. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-8349-6949-1 Blikstein, P., & Krannich, D. (2013). The makers' movement and FabLabs in education: experiences, technologies, and research. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 613-616). ACM. Boisseau, É., Omhover, J.-F., & Bouchard, C. (2018). Open-design: A state of the art review. Design Science, 4. Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2003). Why open source software can succeed. Research Policy, 32(7), 1243–1258. Bonvoisin, J. (2016). Implications of open source design for sustainability. In Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2016 (pp. 49–59). Springer. Bonvoisin, J., Galla, J. K., & Prendeville, S. (2017, April). Design Principles for Do-It-Yourself Production. In International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing (pp. 77-86). Springer, Cham. British Council. (2014). Learning English in Brazil: understanding the aims and expectations of the Brazilian emerging middle classes. São Paulo: British Council. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of sustainability. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers. Fjeldsted, A., Adalsteinsdottir, G., Howard, T. J., & McAloone, T. (2012). Open source development of tangible products. In DS 71: Proceedings of NordDesign 2012, the 9th NordDesign conference, Aarlborg University, Denmark. 22-24.08. 2012. Hyysalo, S., Kohtala, C., Helminen, P., Mäkinen, S., Miettinen, V., & Muurinen, L. (2014). Collaborative futuring with and by makers. CoDesign, 10(3–4), 209–228. Kohtala, C. (2015). Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 654–668. Kwon, B.-R., & Lee, J. (2017). What makes a maker: the motivation for the maker movement in ICT. Information Technology for Development, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1238816 Lakhani, K. R., & Panetta, J. A. (2007). The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(3), 97–112. Laplume, A., Anzalone, G. C., & Pearce, J. M. (2016). Open-source, self-replicating 3-D printer factory for small-business manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 85(1–4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7970-9 Levanen, J., Hossain, M., Lyytinen, T. (2016). Implications of frugal innovations on sustainable development: Evaluating water and energy innovations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(1), 1-17. Monteiro, E. Z., de Mattos Moreno, M., Pina, S. A. M. G., Labaki, L. C., Kowaltowski, D. C., da Silva, V. G., & de Oliveira, M. C. A. (2006). A sense of comfort in open space around owner-built houses: the case of Campinas, Brazil. In PLEA 2006-23rd International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Conference Proceedings. Narduzzo, A., & Rossi, A. (2008). Modularity in action: GNU/Linux and free/open source software development model unleashed. Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy. Nascimento, S. (2014). Critical Notions of Technology and the Promises of empowerment in shared machine shops. Journal of Peer Production, (5). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/editorial-section/critical-notions-of-technology-and-the-promises-of-empowerment-in-shared-machine-shops/ Nielsen, K., Jørgensen, K. A., Taps, S. B., & Petersen, T. D. (2011). Supporting sustainability and personalization with product architecture. In MCPC 2011 World Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization. Open Agriculture Initiative (2016a). Overview. Retrieved from: https://www-prod.media.mit.edu/groups/open-agriculture-openag/overview/ Open Agriculture Initiative (2016b). User discussions. Retrieved from: https://forum.openag.media.mit.edu/t/where-are-you-building-your-food-computer/16/52 Open Knowledge Foundation. (2012). „No Title‟. The Open Design Definition v. 0.5. Retrieved from: https://github.com/OpenDesign-WorkingGroup/Open-Design-Definition/blob/master/open.design_definition/open.design.definition.md. Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Balka, K. (2009). On the open design of tangible goods. R and D Management, 39(4), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00567.x Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management Journal, 33(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.11.002 Shah, S. K. (2008). Open Beyond Software. In M. Cooper, Danese. DiBona, Chris. Stone (Ed.), Open Sources 2.0 (1st ed., pp. 1–28). Sebastopol. Vallance, R., Kiani, S., & Nayfeh, S. (2001). Open design of manufacturing equipment. … on Agile, Reconfigurable Manufacturing, …, 1–12. Retrieved from http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/open-source/Open design of manufacturing equipment.pdf von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation-The MIT Press (2005). Cambridge: MIT Press. SDGs, U. N. (2015). United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ West, J., & O‟Mahony, S. (2008). The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710801970142

Como citar:

Argenton Freire, Rodrigo; Ziggiatti Monteiro, Evandro; "The Transposable Limits of Open Design for Sustainable Development", p-1285-1291. In: . São Paulo: Blucher, 2018.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/sigradi2018-1598