Artigo - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Tipologia de desenhos no Design: uma revisão crítica

Design Drawings' typology: a critical review

PAULA, Bárbara Arantes de ; LEE, Jaehwan ;

Artigo:

Este artigo é fruto do estudo estabelecido através de uma revisão critica sobre as tipologias, taxonomias e demais meios de classificação do desenho dentro do escopo do design. A princípio, visou-se enfatizar a importância contemporânea do desenho como alicerce nos processos em design. O método de análise utilizado foi a revisão crítica, onde doze estudos foram encontrados e escrutinados, com a intenção de ponderar quais são estes tipos de desenho, como cooperam para o processo em design e quais funções estes meios de representação visual desempenham na atualidade.

Artigo:

This article is the result of a study established through a critical review of typologies, taxonomies and other means of classifying drawings within the scope of design. At first, the aim was to emphasize the contemporary importance of drawing as a foundation in design processes. The analysis method used was the critical review, where twelve studies were found and scrutinized, with the intention of pondering what these types of drawing are, how they cooperate for the design process and what functions these means of visual representation perform today.

Palavras-chave: Tipologia do desenho; Taxonomia do desenho; Meios de representação visual.,

Palavras-chave: Drawing typology; Design taxonomy; Means of visual representation.,

DOI: 10.5151/ped2022-8519897

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ADAMS, E. Thinking Drawing. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(3), 244–252, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12153
  • [2] ASHWIN, C. Drawing, Design and Semiotics. Design Issues, 1(2), 42–52, 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511498
  • [3] BIDDULPH, M. Drawing and Thinking: Representing Place in the Practice of Place-making. Journal of Urban Design, 19(3), 278–297, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.890045
  • [4] BOVELET, J. Drawing as Epistemic Practice in Architectural Design. FOOTPRINT: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 7(Autumn), 75–84, 2010. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.2.727
  • [5] DANOS, X., & NORMAN, E. The development of a new taxonomy for graphicacy. The Design and Technology Association, 69–84, 2019.
  • [6] FARTHING, S. Drawing Drawn (A Taxonomy). Visual Communication, 12(4), 423–436, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357212460798
  • [7] GOLDSCHMIDT, G. The Dialectics of Sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381
  • [8] GOLDSCHMIDT, G. On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15(2), 158–174, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(94)90022-1
  • [9] GOLDSCHMIDT, G. The Backtalk of Self-Generated Sketches. Design Issues, 19(1), 72–88, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793603762667728
  • [10] GRANT, M. J., & BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108, 2009. https://doi.org/1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  • [11] GRAVES, M. The Necessity for Drawing. Michael Graves, 235–245, 2005.
  • [12] https://doi.org/10.1007/1-56898-657-2_9
  • [13] HAVE, R., & TOORN, M. V. D. The role of hand drawing in basic design education in the digital age. ENMA International Conference on Engineering and Mathematics, 72–80, 2012.
  • [14] HUA, M., HUANG, S., & CHILDS, P. Developing a Taxonomy for Freehand Sketching in Design. 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, 2018.
  • [15] MEYER, M. W., & NORMAN, D. Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
  • [16] MORONI, S., & LORINI, G. Multiple functions of drawings. Journal of Urban Design, 26(3), 374– 394, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1801341
  • [17] NORP, B., & VAN HOEK, E. Industrial Design Sketching in Practice. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom, September, 1–10, 2019.
  • [18] PEI, E., CAMPBELL, I., & EVANS, M. A Taxonomic Classification of Visual Design Representations Used by Industrial Designers and Engineering Designers. The Design Journal, 14(1), 64–91, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630610x12877385838803
  • [19] SCHENK, P. Developing A Taxonomy on Drawing for Design. International Association of Societies of Design Research, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2007.
  • [20] STEINØ, N. Architectural Drawing: Notation, Reflection, Communication and Presentation. In PPADD 2018 AUS: Process and Practice Across Design Disciplines, pp. 129-135, 2018.
  • [21] ULLMAN, D. G., WOOD, S., & CRAIG, D. The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process. Computers & Graphics, 14(2), 263–274, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0097- 8493(90)90037-x
Como citar:

PAULA, Bárbara Arantes de; LEE, Jaehwan; "Tipologia de desenhos no Design: uma revisão crítica", p. 4403-4419 . In: Anais do 14º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design. São Paulo: Blucher, 2022.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/ped2022-8519897

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações